Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 10
Page 15
15 / 59
Before he covld answer the Counsel's question about a particular section of
the article appear'ng on these paces, Senator HICKENLOOPER requested that the
Chairman grant the privilege to other members of the Committee to exanine the
document before it was read into the Record. Much discussion took place on -
this particular issue, After agreement was made that the article would be -
introduced into the record, BUDENZ then stated that the 22 page draft was one .
of several drafts which he’ had prepared on the article which he had subaitted ©
to Colliers. BUDENZ mentioned that he believed that this draft was om which _
he had prepared sanetime in 1949. He stated that the preparation of the
article "dracged along" unnecessarily. He identified the draft as the first |
¥ i a ~
draft which he had left with Colliers. are a es Pen
~ raw,
Ur. MORGAN then asked ‘BUDENZ if he had had 1 a conversation with LEONARD
PARIS (phonetic) of Colliers relative to this article. He stated that he had.
He was asked if it was a stenographic transcribed conversations He stated oe
that he was not certain,
Yi, HORGAN then read fron a document which appeared to contain questions
and answers that occurred during the conversation between BUDENZ and PARIS con
cerning the article which Colliers was to publish, —
In brief, the questions which Wr, MORGAN read and asked BUDENZ to
exnlain concerned the manner of expression relative to certain statements which
appeared in the draft which BYDENZ had submitted to Colliers lagazine.
"poner, in explaining the reasons for his believing that LATTINORE 9 was .
connected with the Party, stated that onion skin do nis whi re prepared
at the instruction of thea Politburo bore the initi i" onee These initials
BUDSZ stated, were said by ltr. FIZLD to indicate that they were to be identified
s LATTDCRE's. BUDSIZ was asked how he knew this and he replied that JACK .
STACHEL had many times told him that the initial "L" meant LATTIMORE, ‘
BUD=HZ then referred to a meeting which was called by BRODER, at which
policy was discussed. He mentioned that this meeting was in 1943. He stated that
in addition to BRODER, the following attended: STAC-EL, FIELD, BROWER. He
stated that PH2 ATYE might also have been present at that meeting but that if
he were present, he was only passably active. At this meeting, BUDENZ stated ©
that LATTE O2E's name was mentioned when FIELD discussed that there was a change
of attitude as far as the Party was concerned towards CHIANG KAI-SHEK. BUDEZ |
stated that BRCVDER did not seem surprised by FIELD's announcement. He stated = -
that it was indicated at that tine that an article should be written eo reflectire
the new position and he said that on article did appear in the magazine, "Pacific
Affaire", He stated that the substance of this article reflected that Na*ionalist
China was feudal China; tat Red China was Democratic China,
oz
=.
~ ae
a
ae
Coie
Po
A
baat <
‘og ad teed
ae me
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic