Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 1
Page 18
18 / 864
ry 7
@ - @
COMMENTARY
It can be anticipated that the subjects in the Hearst kidnaping
case or any other major hostage-situation_might demand a personal
- confrontation with various individuals upon threat to harm the initial ---——-
victim. This would probably occur more réadily if-the subjects were
"cornered" with the victim or possibly even during'a period where their
presence is unknown. It must be kept in mind when dealing with a "radical"
group that their's might be a quasi-suicidal and/or assassination-type _
mission in this regard. We have always maintained that the safety of the -
victim is.of paramount importance in our over-all operations. Even though
there might be no outright request for an exchange of hostages, we must
consider the situation that the mere fact that an "eye-to-eye" confrontation
is effected could most easily turn into the sudden taking of an additional _
hostage or the intentional killing of the specified individual while the
original victim has not yet been liberated and possibly is being used as a
"cover" or even "bait."' With this in mind we should consider the
alternatives available should such a personal confrontation arise or be
demanded.
There are a multitude of "classes" of individuals who might be. _-
potential recipients of such a demand. Most of them, undoubtedly, would. -
be prominent and influential people in their own fields such as Bureau ©
officials, Federal or state government officials, wealthy industrialists,
celebrities, members of the media, representatives of foreign govern-
ments, civil rights leaders, or a member of the victim's family, to name
just a few. When such a demand is received, unless there aré drastically .
overriding circumstances present, it would seem our first responsibility
would be to immediately alert the individual whose presence was demanded’
so that appropriate protective measures might be instituted. Although the.
Bureau historically has not been a protective-type agency, if such a
situation arises there might be instances where it would be inevitable
that we assume such a role in addition to that protection which might be
afforded by local authorities. —
Many other Gcvernment and private agencies and organizations.
potentially might be involved in determining whether one of their personnel ,
would participate in such a meeting with the subjects even if a demand
was received. Arrangements in “his: regard cannot be made instantaneously’
ons
~4-.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic