◆ SpookStack

ay RR. 0 ~ government in China and he added we urged unity for the struggle against — wa Japan. Mr. MORGAN asked what methods the Communist Party employed to fe advance their aims in this respect and BROWDER replied by direct | address to the people of the United States. This he said was accomplished largely through my own medium as spokesman for the Commmist Party and through writings in the Daily Worker. He was asked if the Communist Party used transmission belts. HBROWDER explained that the term, | transmission belts't had been referred to o incorrectly. Actually, he | | esid, by transmission belts the Communist Party referred to every | , . possible channel of approach. oe / BROWDER was then asked by Mr. MORGAN if he were tantiiar with the Institute of Pacific Relations and if the Communist Party employed - this organization and BROWER replied that the Communist Party did not employ theXnstitute of Pacific Relations. . At this point in the testimony, Mr. MORGAN read from the ~ Record, Page 10,0, the testimony given by Mr. XSUDENZ.*“In this porti f Mr. BUDENZ* testimony, the nemes of NAFFE and FREDERICK VANDERBILT of ‘FIELD were mentioned. Mr. MORGAN asked BROWDER if he knew either of these men. He replied that he did. Eater sien. the wo sna an Mr. LATTIMORE and he replied that he had never seen the man and to hig re fmowledge he did not know hin. He was next as T937 Neting with Br. BUDENZ had d referreato.in his _esteinony there was any mention of the name LATTIMORE... BROWDER replied he ¢ categorically deny any statement | $athe. affect hat the name a was mentioned at that meeting. * Mr. MORGAN continuing to read from the testimony given by Mr. BUDENZ, read that portion of Mr. BUDENZ' testimony which stated that during the October 1937 Meeting, FIELD commended Mr. LATTIMORE for his sesl. Mr. MORGAN asked BROWDER to verify his comment and BROWDER stated that such assertion was false and utterly ridiculous; that it was hard for him to imagine how even a * professional per jurer could make it up. . Mr. MORGAN then asked BROWDER if at the 1943 Meeting of © the Communist Party in New York, did a discussion take place concer informtion reported from Mr. LATTIMORE which indicated that a change, in policy had taken place relative to the Chinese Communist situation) x Again BROWDER stated that he recalls nothing like that being discuss ro and stated he never heard of LATTIMORE's name mentioned in Party circles. 3 He only knew of his name because of certain publications which he had ot written. } ape ee cor oe ote me eee. a -