Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Francis Gary Powers — Part 1
Page 60
60 / 60
VU
-———- Measures ef Nuclear-Disermament-— -
T now turn to the question of our respective ap-
proaches to the problem of nuclear armaments.
It is clear that the Soviet attitude on this matter
is motivated by both political and strategic. con-
siderations. The Soviet Union has attempted
to create pressures throughout the world which
would inhibit free-world use of nuclear weapons
in defense against aggression. In strategic terms,
there can be little doubt that the Soviets have re-
garded nuclear weapons as an important element
in Western strength. They have undoubtedly rea-
soned that, if we could be effectively precluded
from the possibility of using nuclear weapons in
our own defense, while Soviet strength in conven-
tional armaments was retained, our strategic posi-
tion would be impaired. .
Thus over a period of years the Soviet purpose
has been to “ban the bomb.” In the present nego-
tiations at Geneva this theme is once again being
played. The Soviets have again proposed that
each nuclear power should agree not to use nuclear
weapons first. They also propose the complete
elimination of nuclear weapons but have admitted
that this ‘could not be verified by existing
techniques.
How does the United States look st this
problem?
We have recognized, and continue to recognize,
the need to deal effectively with nuclear weapons
in any comprehensive disarmament arrangement.
We believe, however, that nuclear and conven-
tional disarmament measures must be balanced
. 80 that no country or group of countries will ob-
tain, at any stage, a significant military advantage.
We proposed that early steps be taken to limit the
continuing buildup in nuclear weapons. As an
initial step we seek an agreed cutoff, under proper
safeguards, in the future production of nuclear
materials for weapons purposes. We also pro-
pose to begin reduction of existing stockpiles of
nuclear weapons materials by siphoning off agreed
quantities for peaceful uses,
One of our ultimate goals in a disarmament
agreement is the final elimination of nuclear
weapons as may be feasible in the light of techni-
cal and scientific knowledge. Let me note this im-
portant point: At the present time it would not
be scientifically possible to establish means of veri-
fication to confirm whether nuclear stockpiles had
in fact been eliminated. Today a would-be aggres-
May 23, 1960
‘sor could conceal nuclear weapons "without any 7
fear of detection.
But, as I have noted, there are important steps
that can be taken now. We hope that the Soviets
will agree to the specific measures in this area
which I have already outlined.-
Outer Space
Recognizing that the world stands on the
threshold of the space age, the United States has
again proposed at Geneva, as it has in the United
Nations for the past 8 years, that steps be taken
toward insuring the use of outer space for peaceful
Purposes only. We have specifically proposed that
there should be a prohibition, with appropriate
controls, against placing into orbit or stationing in
outer space vehicles carrying weapons of mass
destruction. Technological advances in this field
have been astounding. Satellites are being sent
aloft with increasing frequency. Scientists will
no doubt soon discover ways to bring orbiting
bodies back to a predetermined point on earth.
The military implications of this are profoundly
evident,
It is for these reasons that Soviet failure to deal
concretely with the problems of preventing
weapons of mass destruction from being intro-
duced into outer space is so disquieting. There
may be real danger that we will soon reach the
point of no return so far as control of vehicles
in outer space is concerned.
One could draw an unhappy parallel with the
Soviet rejection in 1947 of the United States pro-
posal to forgo the American monopoly of atomic
weapons and establish full international control of
atomic energy. We know now that the Soviet out-
of-hand refusal to consider this extraordinary
proposal was a tragic turning point in history.
We hope the present attitude of the Soviet
Union with respect to outer space does not portend
the same kind of fateful choice. It would be
tragic indeed if the nations of the world were to
extend to the vast reaches of outer space the mili-
tary rivalries which plague man here on earth.
Maintaining Peace tn a Disarmed World
Another basic difference between the Western
and the Communist approach to disarmament is
highlighted by our proposal that, as disarmament
is achieved, steps must be taken to strengthen and =
823
›
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic