Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Peace And Disarmament Literature — Part 5
Page 68
68 / 171
i
|
t
j
‘
. ‘
Soviet nuclear stockpile grew. It had to
be abandoned after 1954, when hydro-
gen bombs became available to both
East and West. When the U.S.S.R. pro-
ceeded to build up a fleet of long-range
bombers to deliver its hydrogen bombs,
the U.S. became vulnerable to nuclear
counterattack. Some form of nuclear
stalemate by balance of terror seemed
to have arrived.
This balance seemed still further
strengthened about 1957, when rapid
progress in the technology of nuclear
weapons and missiles made it possible
to carry multimegaton hydrogen bombs
in ICBM’s, Because such missiles are
most difficult, if not impossible, to de-
bee eee ewe
PT tee econ enn nnn nen 1
7
i '
H 4
r] 4
|
{ \ .
{ lowe, |
H al eal ae alent ae
i
| ®
“Seemed
\
a
a ial \ ° e
‘
*.
Ly
“se
be based on‘an attack on the U.S. population rather than on US.
airfields aud missile bases. The colored dote on this mup represent
eae
stroy in flight, a nuclear aggressor would
have to leave no enemy missiles unde-
stroyed if it wanted to keep its own
major cities from being wiped out by a
retaliatory attack. The advent of long-
range missiles therefore made the bal-
_ ance of terror more stable.
wo contrasting systems of military
theory evolved in response to this
new situation. The first Jed off from the
premise that a rather stable kind of mili-
tary balance had been reached, in which
neither side could make use of its stra-
tegic nuclear power without ensuring
its own destruction. In other words, the
balance of terror was likely to be rather
*
i nel
e
*
Sepes.
a,
stable against rational action, even
though the actual nuclear strengths of
the two sides were markedly different,
as indeed they were in the middle 1950's,
when the U.S. was already vastly strong-
er in over-all deployed nuclear strength.
This view rested on the assumption that
neither side could hope to knock out the
other's nuclear system entirely. Since
some power to retaliate would survive
attack, a rational government would be
nearly as much, if not just as much, de-
terred from a first strike by the expecta-
tion that it would suffer, say, 10 million
deatns as it would be if the expectation
were 100 million.
This view led to the practical conclu-
the 25 largest U.S. cities. In the 1960 census the combined popula-
tion of the metropolitan areas of these cities was 60.8 million.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic