Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
athan-theoharis — Part 01
Page 12
12 / 21
rtment of History.
Marquette
University
Chartes L. Coughlin Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53233
(414) 224-7217, 224-7385
September 1, 1983
Mr. Steven Garfinkel, Director.
Information Security Oversight Office.
General Services Administration
Washington, D.C. 20405
Dear Mr. Garfinkel:.
the Organization of American Historian's Committee on Access to Documents
and Open Information. Recently,
Executive Secretary of.
b6
b7C
and of your Office's Annual Report to the President for Fy 1982.'She invited.
Committee members to forward our comments directly to you.
Our Committee is presently initiating a study of the varied research.
problems confwonting historians (particularly those interested in aspects
of national security policy, both foreign and defense policy and internal
security.policy). Because at a preliminary stage, we cannot at present share
our findings with you. We do hope to have'a coupleted report by the spring.
of 1984'and, one reason for my writing to you today, was to establish channels
and the opportunity to share our findings and concerns. A second, and more.
immediate, reason was to respond to your invitation for comments on the
1982 Report.
(lst 19105)
of that decision underscores our profession's concerns about the onerous
restrictions historians confront in their research deriving from often capricious
"national security" claims. Indeed, our experiences suggest that the operative
to a policy of maximum,openness--is questionable. We have found "national securityt!
.restictions, even for historically dated documents, excessive, at times arbitrary
and at times capricious. And, on yeading your report, I find myself coming to
a radically different and more pessimistic conclusion. Umwilling to be sweepingly
characterized as a "traditional" critic who reacted "as could be predicted,
my personal experiences in obtaining FBI documents under the Freedom of Information
Hhegoads ssat apgaoad 'aamgng aug ut *pue ansogerp e ugegsns ot adoy I *goy
comments and more generalized examples. I shall. keep this letter brief, and
thus will cite only a few examples. I assume that other respondents from our
Committee will cite fofeign and defense policy decisions, or those involving
the CIA; for that reason I shall comment only on FBI documents..
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic