Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
john-lilly — Part 01
Page 19
19 / 23
OPTIONAL FORM NO10
Moh
UNITED STATES GOVEI
MENT
Bel
Memorandum
Callah
DeL
Mal
McGurre
Rosen
OL
Mr. DeLo
DATE 7-8-60
Tamm
Trotte
W.C
TeleRoo
FROM
no
SUBJECT DR. JOHN C. LILLY
DIRECTOR
COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
BOX 456
ST. THOMAS, VIRGIN ISLANDS
Remy memo dated 6-28-60 advising of Dr. Lilly's visit to FBI Headquarters
on 6-21-60. Dr. Lilly presented a letter of introduction from Julian B. Baird, Under
Secretary of the Treasury. Dr. Lilly claimed the FBI had made an error in information
I given to the Defense Department for a security clearance for Dr. Lilly. An immediate
check reflected that Dr. Lilly was in error and that possibly someone in the Defense.
Department put the blame on the FBI in order to cover a mistake on their part..
Defense of our displeasure at being blamed for what coulhave been an oversight or mistake
on their part.
Attached L'Allier to Belmont memo dated 7-6-60 reflects results of interviews
conducted at Defense Department by SA
pf the Liaison Section. The entireb6
matter was discussed with Mr. George Gouid, Security Services Branch, Office of the
b7C
Secretary of Defense (OsD) and our position was explained and Gould was informed of our
unequivical refusal to accept blame for any error in the granting of a clearance for
Dr. Lilly, if an error was made. Interview with Colonel Philig.
XMitchell, Office of Science,
OSD, reflects that Colonel Mitchell may have been the person who furnished false informa-
tion to Lilly. While Colonel Mitchell did not admit any misconduct on his own part, his
demeanor indicated that he may have been the source of the allegations and a vigorus protest
was lodged with him.
Mitchell was also told that Dr. Lilly was being given the true facts.
and that these were also known to the Defense officials involved in granting clearances.
The Director has noted: "1. Did we do this? 2. I think we should again
demand of Lilly the identity of his source which falsely accused the Bureau & if he refuses
that he be told that it would appear his complaint is a complete fabrication & our files will
reflect his refusal & lack of cooperation. H*
6
1061/x
REC- 64
1 - Mr. Ingram
5 JUL 14 1960
1 - Mr. Belmont
(Attention Name Check Section)
1 - Liaison Section.
RwK:c51 JUL 20 1960
(6)
IME
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic