Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Surreptitious Entries Black Bag Jobs — Part 4
Page 51
51 / 101
4
ANSWER:
ty QUESTION:
QUESTION:
ANSWER:
ee
ba
ae
* ‘QUESTION:
#2
+:
¥
QUESTION: |
_ QUESTION:
J
pe
tlds 7
Sir, would you say that the Cubans who burglarized
Daniel Elzberg's psychiatrist's office should not
“have been convicted then since they thought that
they were on a national security mission? They
didn't intend to violate any laws. That was their
testimony.
I have no judgment insofar as that because my
province is in presenting the facta and for the
review and determination by the courts and if such
an inference was made it was not intended by me
I'm trying to keep in
the area of our facts and that particular thing as
to whether or not they had any intent or whether or
not it is a viable defense is up to the courts.
to give. them any sanctuary.
Mr. Kelley, did you twice mention that you expect
some resolution to this question in the courts?
How is it going to get into the courts?
I don't know.
presidential power--that it might well be necessary .
It possibly will be some sort of a
Gefense, rather some sort of a presentation to the
courts by the Attorney General.
that perhaps this being a Constitutional question--
it being a matter of the executive privilege of the
He has indicated
to have such a review to determine.
and this....
.
Were all of these break-ins conducted with the
permission of either the Attorney General or the
President at the time? Or, were there any that were
conducted without such approval?
w
I cannot, at this point, give you any particulars
about the program.
I just say, as I did before,
Because you don't know or because you're withholding
comment?
I'm withholding comment.
at eb ee +? nant
There was, a_change.insofar_as.the targets just being
in the subsequent area confined to those matters which
we
was there change, in the limitations on the targets \
~~that were used?
eae a ome |
a i
Mr. Kelley, t'm still unclear about distinction
between break-ins before 1966 and ‘afterward, Is the: -
‘yeduction in number the-only change that was made or .:.-:.
were concerned in foreign counterintelligence.
4
ro
*
is-
Se ne
“«
Bs
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic