Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Surreptitious Entries Black Bag Jobs — Part 4
Page 50
50 / 101
ye TP
QUESTION:
ANSWER:
~
QUESTION:
QUESTION:
wee 0 eee.
f
j=
entree enECaeany ne.
{
JANSWER?
permission. There is some dictum to indicate, at
present, that this may be brought up later. But, I
‘know of no authorization which can be obtained per se
for a surreptitious entry.
And, at this point, of
course, the feeling is that these confined as they
are to foreign counterintelligence it flows from
presidential authority as it applies also to the
warrantless wiretaps.
Weren't the civil rights groups, Mr..Kelley, among
some of the organizations who were burglarized?
I'm not going to say anything about where they were,
or against which organizations they were directed, .
only to say that they were, Mr. Nelson, and I hope
that will satisfy you, and I hope that if there is
any revelation to be made later that they can be as
complete as possible because, again, we feel that
the intent was a very good one and there was no
protect the country.
illegality concerned. And the impact of it was to
Sir, how can you say that there was no illegality
concerned if the Constitution says that you have to
have a search warrant to make an entry and without,
as I understand it, even checking this with the
Attorney General, these Agents burglarized private
premises?
The resolution of the problem which you now present
is up to the Department and the courts, and I, of
course, will not engage in anything except to say
that in the defense of the men who authorized .and
‘participated, that they had this intent and within
every criminal violation there is a necessity that
there be the ingredient of intent and there was none
here as far as I can determine.
Mr, Kelley, would you say, sir, that most of these
,
requests for surreptitious entry flowed from presi-
SSUMESLTS 20a
dential authority? Is that what you said, sir?
No, I did not say that.
outline-as to what the authorization was...And, this...
again will be a matter which will be discussed in. __....
the reviews of the Department and the various Congres~
sional committees.
oe oe
I-did not give a complete
*
y
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic