◆ SpookStack

ee a . state? record, and which of the materials J have been shown in the last couple of days are still under seal. So just out of memory I am going to sum- marize certain activities which have been acknowledged that the Bureau undertook, but without being specific with respect to location ae es Sa ee eee een and names, I do it for this reason: it is right that the commities and the press be worried about the treatment of a Nobel Prize win- ner, Dr. King; but there are an awful lot of people who never got close to a Nobel Prize whose names are Jones and Smith, that my review of the files show had violence done to their first amendment rights, Nobel Prize winners will always get protection, but Joe Potatoes doésn’t, and the Committee should focus on him, too. Included in these COINTELPRO activities were, anonymous letters, drafted by Bureau offices in the field, sent to headquarters in Washington, approved. and then put in the mail, intended to break up marriages, not of Dr. King but of Mary and John Jones because one or the other was thought to be a dissenter, might have dressed strangely or showed up at meetings in company of others who dressed strangely. Anonymous letters were sent to university officials and to the several newspapers in that city to prevent university facilities from being made available td a speaker of whom the Bureau disapproved, and it was not a topflight, bigname speaker, In that case, an anonymous letter was sent to me making protest. Being an anonymous letter. it never occurred to me that it came from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The series of anonymous letters, one with the spelling very poor. the grammar sloppy, and another more sophisticated ; protesting the employment of a man by a city, alleging that he was a Communist or came from a Communist family, and there are loyal Americans out of work, what are you doimg. mayor, And to the press, isn't this an outrage. And again the letter. the anonymous letter sent to me saying what are you going to do about this. There are loyal Democrats in this town who need work. And in that case I happened to have known the man about whom the protest was made, and the Bureau’s facts were wrong as hell on that man’s loyalty. He was as loval as you or I. Now, yes or no, are those actions regarded now by the Bureau as within bounds! r. Apams. No, sir. Senator Harr of Michigan. Why were they regarded as within bounds when they were approved by the Bureau? Mr. Apass. Well, I think even under the guidelines of COINTEL PRO, as established. the programs were not designed for the purpose of harassment of an individual, The memorandums indicate they were designed to disrupt the organizations. Some of the turndowns were turned down on this specific wording. This is mere harassment. The rationale would have been—and of course, here, I say some of these you mentioned wouldn't even appear to me to meet the criteria of the program and should have been disavowed. even under the existence of the program. However. in the total context of the program. activities Were to he direstad toward tha arawanizatinn itesalf luv we da not gS Sask WE Bsc AO, Wu do that‘at the present time. Senator Harr of Michigan. Yes. But everything I have summarized rather poorly. was approved by the Bureau at the time by headquarters, not by the field office agents. + - ™s * etka . . et . as oo . + ate thei ho tet atime Ame 8 ute Lm ey de MR Hy ee a