◆ SpookStack

ee me The Attorney General irene “ Subsarock te the receipt of the comzisint, © «=! om a our Noadmuarter:: s.caff prevared and sont a communication ‘~*~ i dated Auqust 5, 1973, to ten FRI field offices. it e specified: “wer plane *vecinient offices cover locations where specific acts of terrorisn, hurclaries, or harassment against Sip and Younq Secialist Alliance (YS?) alleqedky occurred accord- ing to complaint furnished you in referenced cormunication. ‘ After careful review of the eemplaint and of apvrooriate files, each office furnish Headquarters all available portinant nt i “£4 infornation concerning seecific allegations relating to your division. ‘This information snould be furnished hy airtel to Yeadquacttors, vith cory to Vvew York, a5 scon as nosnible, You should be meticuicus in your raview in this regard, bearing in mind that at some future Gate, affidavits may be required concerning these matters.” The last paragraph of this cormunication specified: allegations made in the conpvlaint recard- *Canctea ee nin ing wiretar sing A and coneral Aaliecations regarding cormission of illecal acts by defenfant public officera and thoir agents, & Separate communication will he sent at a later cate to all offices for information with which to answer these allegations. Cur “Mew York Offiee responded with a cormunication dated August 19, 1973. “(T]he only specific act eccurring in the Yew York division is referred to in paraqreachs 68 = 70 ‘concerning tha breaking and entering of the avartment of Norman Oliver ... . The New York Office has no information regarding this matter.” Allcgations con ‘cerning other specific break-ins were made in the complaint, but none of the field offices furnished any positive information regarding these alleged break~ins. . FBI personnel did not prepare a suosequent cormunication to obtain information concerning gencral allegations. In 1973, thic matter was handicd i .Legal Counsel Division by Special —