◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 25

55 pages · May 11, 2026 · Broad topic: General · Topic: Supreme Court · 55 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
i f * ——i ! —— | as dl eR a“ U.S. News & World Report \ .. +» New laws should be possed to ‘safeguard the Fal files'? permit a witness to have his lawyer present and even to consult with him before answering cach specific question. 6. A Royal Commission can require all concerned in the inquiry, including witnesses, to take an oath of secrecy. The duestioning by the Commission can be secret rin since only selected ex te from the testimony are made public, it is tmpassdble to know whether « fair vole. tion was made. Most congressional committee hearings are pubtic and open to the press. 7. A Royal Commission is not subject to or under the control of the courts, Parliament or the Cabinet, and a Commission “is the sole judge of its own procedure.” Con- gressional committees are completely subject to Congress, and they need the assistance of the courts in dealing with contemptuous witnesses. We do not approve, or urge, all of the foregoing practices, but cite them to show what other freedom-loving nations do to protect their security. What Legislation 1s Necessary Our Committee deems the bill introduced to overcome the effect of the Steve Nelson decision to be in the public inter- ests, Serious consideration must be given to tion which 1. Safeguard the confidential nature of _th 2. Give to congressional committees the same freedom to investigate Communists and pro-Communists that these committees have always had to investigate businessmen and labor leaders; 3. Sanction the right of the Federal Government to dis- charge security risks even though they occupy so-called nonsensitive positions; 4. Vest in the Department of Justice the right to question aliens awaiting deportation about any subversive associa- tions and contacts; 5. Correct the notion that the Smith Act was not in- tended to prohibit advocacy and teaching of forcible over- throw as an abstract principle; : 6. Permit schools, universities, bar associations and other organizations to set standards of membershib high enough to exclude those who refuse to testify frankly and fully about their past activities in furtherance of Communist plans to conquer the free world by subversion. In recent weeks the New York “Daily Worker” has been replete with articles and editorials proclaiming that the use- fulness of FBI informants in future prosecutions has been de- stroyed; thatthe Smith Act is now ineffective and for all practical purposes invalidated; that the effectiver- 13 of con- gressional inquiries into subversive activities has been cur- tailed and that the Government loyalty-security program is under serious attack. In reporting on fts current fund drive the “Daily Worker” has stated it experienced an eniiven- ing of contributions which it attributed to renewed hope by its supporters for its future. The reaction of the Communist Party to the recent Supreme Court decisions clearly depicts the resilience of the organiza- Gon and the speed with which its lead recognizes an advantage and presses to capitalize to the fullest extent on circumstances conducive to the growth of the organization. Some Americans may wonder whether an organization the size of the Communist Party, U.S.A., with a consistent d= cline in membership in recent years, represents a danger to 138 Court in Jencks 0. United States and legislation sequently introduced in Congress to define the the rule announced by the Court in that case. In the Jencks case the Court held that one accused by the United States of a criminal offense is entitled to inspect, for i purposes of impeschment, prior statements and reports which the prosecution witnesses had previously made to the Covern- snent and ‘which touch upon the the tial Further, the defense need not Brat lay a foun- dation of inconsistent testimony in order to obtain production of these documents. We are in firm agreement with the Court's view that the accused's right to make an adequate defense must not be by an arbitrary withholding of pertinent docu- ments by the prosecution. We are equally strong in our belief, however, that the rules by which these documents are produced should be defined with sufficient restriction that one accused of subversion against this nation and its people will not be allowed to nan mage at will through Government documents containing confidential information important to the national security and of no relevance whatever to the defense of the accused. There is danger of much a result. “Grave Emergency” From Ruling The Attomey Ceneral himself testified before the Congress only recently, declaring that a grave emergency resulted from the Supreme Court decision in the Jencks case. He asserted that some trial courts have interpreted the Jencks decision to require that the Government submit to de- fense not only those reports and statements specified by the Supreme Court, but also the investigative report of the ease, much of which fs neither relevant nor material to the defense of the accused, We believe the effect of such interpretations is to weaken immeasurably the p: and necessary defenses of society, without granting to accused any additional information which he rightfully needs to make his defense. We also point out that the investigative reports sometimes contain the names of third persons who originally were linked to the case in a manner subsequently found to be innocent. To release the names of these innocent le from the bond of Government secrecy would not promote the interests of justice. On the contrary, & would be injustice of the rankest sort. Accordingly we belleve that a firm stand should be taken in support of legislation, already introduced in the Congress, which would recognize the rights of the accused as defined by the Supreme Court in the Jencks decision, but at the and subversives as a lever to out of the Government files information to which they are not_en of which can serve DO t to jeopardize the rights of innocent persons and the public at large. ‘ Your Committee calls attention to the report to the Con- gress which was recently made by the Commission on Govern- ment Security, of which Loyd Wright, past president of the U. 8, MEWS @ WORLD REPOAT, Avg. 14, $057
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 15
Jump straight to page 15 of 55.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic