Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 18
Page 125
125 / 129
2. Western Airlines v. Criswell, 105 S.Ct. 2743
€6+17~+85)
In order to establish that age 60 is a bona fide
occupational qualification (BFOQ) to justify forced retirement of
flight engineers, an airline must show that: 12) retirement at
age 60 is reasonably necessary to safe transportation of
passengers; 2) determining abilities of flight engineers above
age 60 on individualized basis is highiy impractical; and 3) some
flight engineers above age 60 possess traits precluding safe and
efficient job performance that cannot be ascertained by means
other than knowing their age.
Ke. RICO ~ 18 U.S.C. 1961-8
I, Sedima v. imrex, 105 S.Ce. 3275 (€7-1-85)
2. American National Bank and Trust Co, v. Haroco,
1605 S.Ct, 3291 (€7-1-85)
Criminal convictions for predicate acts that constitute
"racketeering activity” are not prerequisites to maintenance of
2 mE luc aman ee al ana fr
private civil actions under che Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. 1961-1968). Under the statute,
racketeering activity is defined as acts “chargeable” under
several generically described state criminal laws, or acts
“indictable” under numerous specific federal criminal provisions
(including mail and wire fraud), or any "offense" involving
bankruptcy or securities fraud or drug-related activities that is
"punishable" under federal law. In these cases, the Court held,
in a 5-4 decision, that to require prior convictions for these
predicate acts before a suit could be maintained was contrary to
the language and intent of the RICO statute. The Court also held
that a plaintiff, in order to maintain a civil RICO action, need
not establish a distinct “racketeering injury" beyond the injury
resulting from the predicate acts themselves.
Til. State Statutes
A. Fleeing Felon
Il. Memphis Police Dept. v. Garner, 105 S.Ct. 1694
(3-27-85)
In Garner, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional
a state statute which authorized police officers to use deadly
force to prevent the escape of fleeing felons. The Court held
that deadly force may not be used by the police except when
necessary and in 1) self defense or defense of others or 2) to
prevent the escape of a felon who committed a crime involving the
infliction or threatened infliction of serious bodily injury.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic