◆ SpookStack

Qjak Brae fila Ciuhe RGD. “ a a ty that there was 2o evidence to sustaia the finding that he knew the seditious ‘eharacter of the printed matter. The court upheld the order, saying that where the alien was given a full and fair hearing, mere error, ever if it consisted in finding an essential fact without adequate supporting evidence, was not a denial of due process of law. Gitlow v. New York (1925) 268 U.S. 652 a Gitlow was convicted of violating the criminal anarchy statute ef New York, He was charged with priating end circulating a Manifesto advocating the Communist Revolution, The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. It held that a state does not deny the freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution by punishing utterances advocating the overthrow of erganized government by force, violence and unlawful means. United States ex rel Vajteuer vw. Com'r (1927) 273 U.S. 103 Vajtaner was arrested in deportation proceedings on the charge that he had illegally entered the United States because prior te er at the time of his entry he believed in and advecated the overthrew ef the United States government and had written seditious pamphlets. The Supreme Court sustained the deportation order, It found that the order was sup- ported by substantial evidence and that the action of the iuaigration authorities in drawing inferences from his refusal to answer questions did not deprive him of any constitutional right, where he had not asserted the privilege against self-incrimination in the proceedings before the immigration authorities. oo NE YS AO LL RR oa RE NE A A RR EA