Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 12
Page 74
74 / 114
ca ee Tiel i Qe ’
‘ . - “ ees 3 Me
ee he ot +
Page 4 FORT SMITH TIMES RECORD
| “Ks We See ft
Jami Those Threats Against Ike -
Four prisoners In the federal reformatery at
El! Reno, Okla., were indicted on charges they had
threatened to kill President Eisenhower and Vice
President Nixon. Two of them were accused of “con-
-spiring with” the others to make the threats.
Now a question occurs to us: Wili the
prosecution of persona making such threats
—which sre illegal, pf course—be hindered by
a new principle laid dewn recently ” the
rer supreme court of the U. §.? as
Several alleged comanuniets ‘naa bed
of conspiring to teach the overthrow 0 the U.
vernment by force. The charges were under ' 2
fiw known a6 the Smith act—whick wakes the aly
leged acts a crite.
Ca eae ee i eT th ee
ine sup EHS VVUrL Tulse, ‘ ECEGI, LOL SUEn
wiction isn't justified by proof ie defendants ad-
a en
——______
os vocated such an idea or urgéd such an idea or action. RE: UNITED STATES SUPREME
There must, the court held, be some concrete COURT
move against the government—in others words, an.
Se actual action toward overthrow of the gevernment.
h Now most of the defendants ian am SOUTHWEST AMERI CaN
“threats against the president” cases aren't SOUTHWEST-TIMES ac OR |
accused of actually deing anythi . : _—
most of them have simply been hewased of of FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS
- making the threats. os 4 DATE /Z- 2 ~.>
i PAGE tt _
That's true in the fotir cases in. Oklahoma— ne me ne
they not only were NOT accused of making any at-
fempt on anyone's life-«naturally, they echah
since they were in prison oats ae
Now we wonder - +» ; a es
Ta the rincipla gan’ re
victed be principle gat
threatening it coin |
euch eases? . Le? Preteen | { |
- That's another towue whieh hes @ tong yy
to go before final deision - ~~
But it seems to us it's logical to bellow’. he
“overt act’ ruling eventually may effget “the He rym pa
“threats” charges and iso many other efges tn be. ai FL -
‘which legislators have outlawed one thing.
in iteelf, because—they held~tt definitely
, intent to do another, was!
ee _- - ie ari nd
Pere aeree remem ad UREN? PORTERS aOR ST vie oe te
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic