Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 5
Page 13
13 / 77
OFFICE OF DIRECTOR
‘
» DIVIsiOn of INVESTIGATION
-
‘
og 7 Ot
d
T:HCB Te
. Mt Peres naa a.
wind: L
I have reviewed the attechecféecisions dunued
dovm by thedSuprese Court, and with one exception
have noted therein nothing of interest to the Livisiai
Tne one exception is tae ceclsion uancec coun in tis |
entitled Margaret Sheagiynch against tue United State:
and Sam Mcilner against tiie United States. In these
cases the United States demurrec to tie petition filec
in atvVar Risk Incurance case on the ground that the
Court was without jurisaiction to entertain the suit
because tue consent of the United States to be sued
had been witharaym by the Aet of Tiarch £0, 1923,
Clause 3, 42, Statute 9, commonly called the Econory
Act. The Lower Courts custcinea tue denurrers, their
jucguents being affirmed by the Circuit Court of
Appeals. The Supreme Court reversed tne decision.
Supervisor Lott, handling var Risk Insurance cases,
will prepare a bulletin or form letter to all field
offices as soon as ilr. Bearcslee has subnitted
information relative to the probable praciicel effect
of this decision u,on pending sar Risk Insurance
Litigation. REOORDED
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic