◆ SpookStack

Appellant Challenges the constitutionality under Article III of the Constitution, and 28 USC § 453 as constitutional Error for federal judges, justices,attorneys,clerks,deputies,assist- ants,and law clerks,to follow the Federal Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedurals in [ Pro Se P-A-I-D Pleadings ],as here, the willful,callous, and Wanton failure.of district judge,Will- iam D.Striehl to make Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law as required under Rule 52 Federal Rule Civil Procedural,and WHETHER, district judge,Stiehl would have acted in the same manner,if the four(4) P-A-I-D Civil Rights complaint(S) had been filed by attorneys for the White,Rich,Famous and Powerful ? l-Here,four(4) Appellant's Civil Rights Complaint(S) Which he Paid all costs and fees as other litigants,but all his four complaints were assigned to the same judge,despite Appellant's Motion pursuant to 28 USC § 455 et seq,which were denied by this racist ,bias,and bigot judge,that are under the erroneous presumption that federal judges,justices,attorneys and other officers of the court is above the law,and to name a judge in a civil complaint,is automaticaily Dead on Arrival to Federal district court,subject to Sua Sponte Dismissal prior to serv- ice upon Defendants,regardless if other persons are also named in the complaints.No officer of the Government is so high that he/she is above the lew.See e.g., Rutz vs-Economou, 438 US 478 at 506,57 L Ed 2d 895,98 S Ct 2894 at 2910,1911(1978);0'Shea vs.Littleton, 414 US 488 at 503,504,38 L Ed 2d 674,94 S Ct 669 at 679,680(1974);Dennig vs.Sparks, 449 US 24,66 L Ed 2d 185, at 191,101 S Ct 183(1980);City of Los Angeles vs.Lyons, 461 US ~12- 4