◆ SpookStack

s ""beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief'" Conley vs.Gibson,supra., 355 US at 45,46,78 S Ct 99,2 L Ed 2a 80(1972).The Question,here,is. WHETHER,under these United States Supreme Court's Precedent(S), and doctrine of Stare Decisis,Patterson vs.-McLean Credit Union, 490 US 164,105 L Ed 2d 132,109 S Ct 2363(1989),Jones vs.Alfred H.Mayer Co.,su- pra., the district judge,William D.Stiehl,deliberate failure to adhere to the Constitution of the United States: and Prec- edent(S) of the Supreme Court,Violated Articles III § I and Iv § 2 of the Constitution,that Justices and Judges shall hold office only during good Behavior,and IV § 2(1) The citi-~ zens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens of the several States.Section 2 of the Constitution,gives Congress the power to enforce the provi- sions of the Civil Rights Acts,through appropriate Legislat- ion.Here,the federal courts did exceeded the scope of all po- wer under the Constitution,by ongoing conspiratorial Overt Acts/Crimes,that disregards 28 USC § 1654,making the act Un- constitutional on its face,for liter aila,total lack of enfor- ment by federal judges,using their power of the United States to deny citizens of the United States access to court,right to be head,as required by the statile(28 usc § 1654 in Pro Se Cases ] It is the duty of this Circuit Court,to commence the Impeachment process,or a failure to do so,violates title 42 usc § 1-9-8-6, 28 USC § § 453 and 455,et seq.Article III § I. (2) -li-