◆ SpookStack

. PLAINTIFF rue CHARGES THAT THE sareuc@, CRANSTON POLICE . DEPARTMENT "ET AL", DID HARASS, INTIMIDATE AND INTERFERE WITH COUNSEL DAVID C. MORETTI,ESQ., IN RETALIATION FOR HIS HAVING , SERVED THE DEFENDANT JOHN TOMLINSON, WITH A"SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM". . PERTAINING TO TESTIMONY GIVEN, ON MAY 10th, 1984, OF WHICH THE PLAINTIFF DID HAVE HIS COUNSEL MORETTI, CHALLENGE, AS PERJURY, BY WAY OF THIS SUBPOENA. DEFENDANT TOMLINSON WAS TO APPEAR, IN ANSWER TO THIS SUBPOENA, WITH RECORDS, THAT WOULD HAVE PROVED THIS BERJURY. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT THIS SUBPOENA WAS SERVED TO THE DEFENDANT TOMLINSON, JUNE 22ND, 1984, and that on June 23rd,1984, PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL WAS CHARGED BY THE SAME CRANSTON POLICE FORCE, (ACTING AS AGENTS FOR GOVERNOR DiPRETE, TRAFICANTE, PRESIDENT REAGAN, ALL DEFENDANTS,) WITH CARRYING A GUN WHILE INTOXICATED. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT THIS ACTION, WAS IN RETALIATION FOR NORMAL LEGAL PRACTICE, "THIS SUBPOENA”, AND THAT THIS ACTION WAS USED AS LEVERAGE, BY THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, AND ALL DEFENDANTS AS CHARGED, IN DEPRIVATION OF THIS PLAINTIFFS, RIGHTS, OF --ACCESS TO THE COURTS OF THIS STATE AND COUNTRY, FREE FROM HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION, OF HIMSELF, OR COUNSELS ,---- IN VIOLATION OF THE PLAINTIFFS, 1ST, 4th, 7th, and 14th, AMENDMENT RIGHTS, AND THIS AS WELL AS WITNESSES, AND TO BE FREE OF COERCED/PROTECETD PERJURY, IN ANY AND ALL COURTS OF THIS STATE AND COUNTRY...-+sececcscereees PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT THIS " INTERENCE WITH COUNSEL, BY THIS CHARGE ", BY CRANSTON POLICE, DID CARRY A 5 YEAR TERM, IF CONVICTED, TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL, MORETTI. FURTHER, THE LEGAL REPRESENTATION OF THIS FIRM, DID DECLINE AFTER THIS ARREST, AND COUNSEL MORETTI, DID RELATE, TO THE PLAINTIFF PRIOR TO THE LOSS OF THE DECISION IN THIS CASE, THAT IT WAS HIS OPINION, THAT HE WAS CHARGED, IN RETAL- IATION FOR THIS SUBPOENA....AND PURSUING PLAINTIFFS LEGAL MERITS.... PLAINTIFF FURTHER CHARGES THAT THESE REPUBLICAN DEFENDANTS, ET AL THIS COUNT VII, AND ALL COUNTS THIS COMPLAINT, HAVE USED AND ARE USING THIS CRANSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, AS THEIR PRIVATE ARMY, AS WELL AS ALL POLICE DEPARTMENTS, THIS STATE, AND NOW ACTS OF OMISSION, OF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT/FBI, AS SAME......IN COMPLETE DEPRIVATION OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS, AND CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, PRIOR TO THIS INCIDENT, THIS INCIDENT, AND TO THIS DAY.....IN ACTS OF TERROR, OF THE PLAINTIFFS LIFE, AND TO WITNESSES, IN ALL CHARGED> COURT ACTIONS, TO DEPRIVE PLAINTIFF OF SAME ... FAIR,TRIALS/HEARINGS. PLAINTIFF FURTHER CHARGES THAT THIS DENIAL OF BENIFITS, WAS OF AND IN THE ACTS / TO KEEP THE PLAINTIFF DESTITUTE, WITHOUT FUNDS TO OBTAIN ANY ATTORNEY FROM OUT OR STATE, SEEK PUBLICATION--freedom of press--WHICH WOULD HAVE EXPOSED THIS TERRORIZATION.....seeceeeee PLAINTIFF CHARGES FURTHER DEPRIVATION OF THESE BENIFITS,TO DEPRIVE PLAINTIFF OF SAME MONIES, OF WHICH PLAINTIFF WOULD HAVE USED TO SEEK PUBLIC OFFICE, AND OQUT-OF FEAR OF EXPOSURE, IN ANY COMPAIGN, AND THUS GROSS......DEPRIVATION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH, POLITICS, ASSEMBLY, ALL lst AMENDMENT RIGHTS........AS IN VIOLATION OF ALL OTHERS AS CHARGED THIS COMPLAINT, " EXPOSURE OF THESE CRIMINALS "... PLAINTIFF CHARGES ALL DEFENDANTS, WITH CRIMINAL TAMPERING IN THIS WORKERS COMPENSATION CASE, AND ALL OTHER AS CHARGED ALL COUNTS THIS COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFF DEMANDS TRAT THE DEFENDANTS RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANIES, ADLER, POLLACK & SHEEHAN,INC. AND AGENT FOR (142)