◆ SpookStack

£) PLAINTIFF CHARGES ALL CASES AS CHARGED THIS PARAGRAPH, KC 82-96, KC 82-703, and KC 83-841, WERE CONSOLIDATED, WERE OF THE SAME NATURE, ALL DEFENDANTS GOING IN DISGUISE AS EACH OTHER,AIDING WITH EACH OTHER, IN ACTS OF CONCERT AND OMISSION, AND ALL DID AID AND ABET IN THE GROSS DENIAL OF FAIR TRIALS, PERJURY, TAMPERING OF WITNESSES, JURIES, JUDICIAL OPINIONS, AND INTIMIDATION AND HARASS- MENT TO DEPRIVE THIS PLAINTIFF OF HIS RIGHTS TO SAME FAIR TRIALS. AND ALL COUNSELS AS CHARGED THIS COMPLAINT, THIS COUNT VII, AND THIS PARAGRAPH, WITH SEPARATE LEGAL MAL-PRACTICE, CONSPIRING TO COMMIT MAL-PRACTICE, COMMITTING MAL-PRACTICE, AND FAILURE TO MAINTAIN--CLIENT--LAWYER CONFIDENTIALITY--CONSPIRING WITH EACH OTHER TO PREVENT ANY LAWFULL AND EQUAL/FAIR TRIALS OR HEARINGS-- WITH INTENT OF GAGGING/SILENCE IN THIS/THESE CASES, ET AL, AND AS FOLLOWS........eeee+- (ALL COUNSELS NAMED,DEFENDANTS THIS PARAGRAPH) RHODE ISLAND WORKERS COMPENSATION CASE---83-1716, JOHN J. STARADUMSKY VS TOMLINSON TRANSPORTATION/RELIANCE INSURANCE CO:S. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT HE DID OBTAIN THE LAW FIRM OF LOVETT, MORGERA, SCHEFRIN, & GALLOGLY,LTD, RAUL L. LOVETT,ESQ«, AND JOHN HARNETT,ESQ., AND"JOHN DOES LAWYERS, TO BE NAMED LATER AFTER DISCOVERY, IF NEEDED", AGENTS FOR, ALL DEFENDANTS...IN FEBRUARY, OF 1983, AND THAT THESE AGENTS, COUNSELS FOR THE _ PLAINTIFF IN THIS ACTION, DID COMMIT MAL-PRACTICE, DENY PLAINTIFF OF ADEQUATE AND TIMELY HEARINGS, CONSPIRE TO PREVENT TESTIMONY, HEARINGS, DEPOSITIONS, AND DID AID AND ABET WITH " JOHN DOES ", WORKERS COMPENSATION COURTS, IN REMOVING, REPLACING, AND ALTERING DOCUMENTS, IN THIS COURT FILE, AND FROM THE HOME OF THE PLAINTIFF. OF WHICH ALTERATION, REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT WITH FORGED DOCUMENTS, DID LEAD TO THE LOSS OF PLAINTIFFS WORKERS COMPENSATION CASE AGAINST SAME TOMLINSON/RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANIES...... AND THE PLAINTIFF CHARGES FURTHER MANIPULATION AND CONSPIRACY WITH JUDGE ROTONDI, DEFENDANT PRESIDING IN THIS CASE, TO DEPRIVE SAME PLAINTIFF OF THESE BENIFITS AND SETTLEMENT ( PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT THIS JUDGE ROTONDI ,-“COMMISSIONER IN THIS CASE ", WAS AN APPOINTEE OF J. JOSPH GARRAHY,DEFENDANT, AND DID ATTEMPT BY AND THROUGH THESE COUNSELS, AN~ FORCED ADMITTANCE OF "PARANOIA AS PRE-REQUISITE OF AWARD OF COMPENSATION BENIFITS, AND SETTLEMENT THIS CASE", AND WHEN THIS WAS REFUSED, DENIED, REBUTTED, BY THIS PLAINTIFF, THE BENIFITS WERE DENIED AND ANY AND ALL MEDICAL AND OTHER TESTIMONY, THAT DID PROVE PLAINTIFFS CASE, WAS THROWN OUT, OMITTED, REFUSED ENTRY, TESTIMONY WAS IGNORED, PERJURY WAS ALLOWED, SUBPOENAS WERE IGNORED, AND THE PLAINTIFF WAS, HARASSED, INTIMIDATED, AND THREATENED, ON THE ROAD TO COURT HOUSE--IN HALLS OF THE COURTHOUSE IN THE COURT ROMM, AND CRIMINAL ACTS OF DEPRIVATION, AS WELL AS CIVIL ACTS OF DEPRIVATION OF PLAINTIFFS RIGHTS TO A FAIR HEARING WERE DENIED.) . PLAINTIFF CHARGES, THAT DUE TO THIS LEGAL MAL-PRACTICE, BY THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS, HE WAS FORCED TO RETAIN OTHER COUNSEL, BEING “ MORETTI AND PERLOW LAW OFFICES, DAVID C. MORETTI,ESQ. AND JEFFREY PERLOW ESQ., WHO ON DECEMBER 8th,1983, DID REPRESENT ME IN THIS MATTER FURTHER. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT THESE DEFENDANTS DID FURTHER COMMIT MAL~PRACTICE, FAIL TO REPRESENT THIS PLAINTIFF ADEQUATELY, PREPARE PROPERLY, HOLD ADEQUATE DEPOSITIONS, TESTIMONY ON STAND, AND FURTHER DID CONSPIRE, TO DEFRAUD THIS PLAINTIFF, IN THIS WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARING....-RESULTING IN LOSS OF THIS CASE... (141)