Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 12
Page 19
19 / 58
_— *
-- f
me sTanc’ "a FORM no. 64
Office Memor\, ndum - UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : The Dtréctor DATE: May 17, 1950
: FROM : D. Me Ladd wy me 7 VA "aon
any ) fa tt
PA —/. SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE BRANCH, U. S« GOVERMENT
IOYALTY OF COVER WENT EMPLOYEES. R
PURPOSE: To respond to your inquiry as to whether we are sound in
not having mentioned, in our memorandum to Peyton Ford of Nay 15, 1950, inci-
dental references concerning an individual named by Senater MeCarthy which
appeared in collateral reports furnished to the State Department on other people.
and in not mentioring confidential memoranda furnished to the State
in connection with the Grerory case and investigation concerning
Communist activities of government employeese
PACKGECUND: My memorandum of May 15, 1950, attached f
randum to Mr. Peyton Ford furnishing to the Department, in accordance with his request,
information regarding matcrial sent to the Civil Service Commission and/or the State
Department regarding the 81 individuals identified by Senator McCarthy. This material
was furnished in connection with a request made by Senator Tydings that the Attorney
General furnish him with a letter regarding the material transmitted by the Bureau
concerning these 81 canese —
On page two of my memorandum of Fay 15, 1950, it was pointed out that in
connection with the review of our files, in additicn to reports and memoranda -
specifically relating to individuals identified on the Tydings "subpoena" list, it -
was found that collateral references to these individuals were located in other reports
and communications transmitted to the Department of State in some instances; that as |
a general rule these incidental references had not been included in the memorandum to:
the Department; that in the past confidential memoranda have been supplied to the i"
State Department in connection with the "Gregory" case, as well as investigation con-.
cerning underground Communist activities of government employees, and that in these |
memoranda numerous individuals were involved and information from highly confidential
sources was included; that in such memoranda, where one of the persons named by
MeCarthy is mentioned collaterally, we had not listed the Gregory sumnary or the
summary on the umerground Communist activities of government employees since it was
felt to do so would undoubtedly cause the Subcommittee to ° shee copies of the
confidential memoranda. /
a a 478-190
With respect to this particular ret eae mor Pee May 15, 1950,
you noted, "Are we absolutely sound in marked ae ee n PYUR LT Heat nothing
which is material withheld." re ns ‘312 -
xt is felt that we are entirely so ES not having mentdoiied incidental
appearing in reports or memoranda given to the State Department concerning
an entirely different person or subject. An example of the type of incidental
references referred to would be a case where we have conducted a or Voice of
98 JUL 1 01958 ye —
t em TaN, OT TAD ET ype cca oe ee ct eee
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic