Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Medgar Evers — Part 1
Page 35
35 / 60
PAGE FOUR . | a
VARIOUS DIFFERENT TYPES OF CHEMICAL IN VARIOUS PORTIONS OF THE
BODY. ALSO ASKED IF BLOWING HOT HUMID BREATH OVER AN UNDEVELOPED
“LATENT WOULD ASSIST IN BRINGING THIS LATENT OUT. HARGROVE
STATED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES THIS PROCEDURE WOULD ASSIST
IN DEVELOPING LATENT. |
LOTT CITED A NINETEEN FIFTYEIGHT MURDER CASE IN WHICH
HARGROVE TESTIFIED IN RESPONSE TO QUESTION THAT THERE WAS NO
WAY TO TELL HOW LONG A FINGERPRINT HAD BEEN ON A GUN IN THAT
CASE. OR REDIRECT EXAMINATION, HARGROVE STATED THAT IN NINETEEN
FIFTYEIGHT CASE, CIRCUMSTANCES WERE DIFFERENT, MURDER WEAPON
HAD BEEN FOUND IN A ROOM, AND THE SURROUNDINGS DIFFERENT FROM
INSTANT CASE. , .
ON CROSS EXAMINATION, HARGROVE GENERALLY CONFINED HIS
JUSTIFICATION OF OPINION AS TO AGE OF FINGERPRINT ON EXTERIOR
FACTS SUCH AS LOCATION OF GUN, NO INDICATION THAT LEAVES, OR
TWIGS, HAD BRUSHED AGAINST LATENT, AND LACK OF EVIDENCE OF
DUST OR DEW OVER LATENT FINGERPRINT. DID NOT STATE ON EITHER
DIRECT OR CROSS THAT THERE WAS ANY SCIENTIFIC METHOD FOR
.
2.
cryee o> “7 — ae met oe ia 7 ae a Le
2S EES eee 3
< Sear —s? wo ee at
ery
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic