◆ SpookStack

NO 157-1163 PAGE Two a | OPINION AS TO THE AGE OF LATENT. DEFENSE OBJECTED AND COURT OVERRULED OBJECTION. STATED QU@TE'I BELIEVE THIS PRINT IS NOT OVER TWELVE HOURS OLD’ UN@YOTE. SAID HIS OPINION FORMED BASED ON..THE CONSIDERATION OF CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING WHERE RIFLE FOUND. TESTIFIED THAT ON JUNE TWENTYTHREE, LAST, FINGERPRINTED BECKWITH AND COMPARED FINGERPRINTS AGAINST LATENT. DEFENSE OBJECTED TO TESTIMONY CONCERNING FINGERPRINTING OF BECKWITH INASMUCH AS BECKWITH, ACCORDING TO HARGROVE, SAID QUOTE‘I OBJECT TO HAVING MY FINGERPRINTS BEING MADE’ UNQUOTE. DEFENSE CONTENDED THIS WAS VIOLATION OF BECKWITH*S CONSTITUTIONAL. RIGHTS. JUDGE OVERRULED OBJECTION. HARGROVE TESTIFIED THAT LATENT WAS IDENTICAL WITH RIGHT INDEX FINGER OF BECKWITH, BASED ON FOURTEEN POINTS OF IDENTIFICATION. IN TESTIMONY, HARGROVE USED COLORED SLIDE SHOWING LATENT FINGERPRINT SIDE BY SIDE WITH THE ROLLED IMPRESSION. . HARGROVE WAS CROSS. EXAMINED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY HARDY LOTT FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE AND ONE HALF HOURS. LOT? ATTACKED | HIS QUALIFICATIONS BY SHOWING HARGROVE WAS GRADUATE OF INSTITUTE a “ Ome