Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Malcolm X — Part 15
Page 38
38 / 154
/
"men were unique indeed. But he con-
founded me again. Instead of any
remotely generous sentiment, he ex-
plaled coniemptuously. “We're not
white person when 22,000,000 Ameri-
can Negroes are being tortured,” he
cried.
Then suddenly he shouted “All
right! Hurray! Hurray! Hurray!” but
immediately proceeded to catalogue
the list of crimes suffered by Negroes
at the hands of white America. And
‘when, a few moments later, a solt-
spoken, gray-haired (white) citizen
arose and implored Malcolm to let
the audience observe one moment of
silence in memory of Mr, Klunder,
the answer was another trade; he
would never “use any energy applaud-
ing the sacrifice of a white man” in a
world in which Negroes were sys-
tematically victimized.
It is many weeks since this oc-
curred, but the image of the episode
remains with me. One clings to the
view that there can be certain com-
munication in the world, and that
both instinct and intelligence would
have led Malcolm X to respond with
a measure of common humanity—
even if only to underline the sadness
of the human condition—at that
moment. One had the feeling instead
that he believed his cause might
somehow be undermined by such a
display of “bourgeois sentimentality.”
fl
|
1 have described these episodes in
detail not because they were peculiar-
ly historic but because they may help
to illuminate the internal crisis con-
fronting the Freedom Movement.
In The Progressive in March of
this year I wrote of the moral crisis
of the white liberals. It is no less
serious now than it was then. Noth-
ing written here is designed to sug-
gest any diminution in my sense of
the priority of that problem. There
are innumerable half-truths in the
thrusts of Malcolm X.
But that is no excuse for silence
about the real nature of his role, and
the dead-end toward which he is lead-
ing many frustrated, alienated Ne-
groes and some white camp-followers.
Perhans even more important is the
prospect that imitators will spring
up—as they already have in some
places—and that the civil rights bat-
tle will be poisoned by their presence.
Too many “militants"—white and
going to stand up and applaud one Negro—have rationalized his per-
formance with the claim that the
threat he poses provides a certain
weapon for those civil rights leaders
still operating in the real world.
There was a time when I found some
validity in that view. But that time
is past. His is an adventure in diver-
sionary discord. Jt rests on accept-
ance of the segregationist premise
that the cause of equal rights in Amer-
ica is essentially doomed; that Martin
Luther King's dream was a delusion;
that, to achieve self-respect, the Ne-
gro can do little more than take up
arms to defend himself and await his
deliverance to an African promised
land. But the premise is false and
the promise is demagogy.
I am not pleading for patience and
fortitude. I am saying only that the
man who sneeringly refers to Eleanor
Roosevelt as “supposedly a liberal,”
and who recklessly talks of substitut-
ing bullets for ballots, is inviting not
liberation but disaster, and playing
capriciously with human beings to
whom he offers nothing but the pros-
pect of futile violence and turmoil.
The answer to such criticism, of-
fered by Malcolm and his more
sophisticated apologists, is that the
non-violence movement has proved a
failure and a fraud; that the degra-
dation of the Negro ghettos in the
North grows worse rather than bet-
ter; that the Southern landscape is
still an unrelieved nightmare, bright-
ened in no serious degree by scattered
breakthroughs in schools and at
lunch counters.
The indictment has much validity,
but his alernative makes no serious
sense. On that night in Manhattan, I
heard Malcolm describe his vision of
Harlem—a firmly-ruled black com-
munity in which “no white man will
be able to set foot without a ‘guide’.”
In his tortured dream, the black
populace—during this period of
transition before che ultimate return
to Africa—will build Algerian-type
walls around iw own sectors, and
thus achieve at least temporary es-
cape from white persecution. One
can only sadly observe that Georgia's
Senator Richard Russell would prob-
ably find this a satisfactory formula
for settlement of the racial problem.
Its grotesque absurdity seems ap-
parent; yet it would be self-deception
to deny chat, amid the stagnation and
slow-motion that beset the qués¢ for
equal rights, such madness has
achieved a growing appeal. It is re-
flected not merely in the formation
of small terrorist gangs that draw
spiritual inspiration, if not formal
direction, from Malcolm and his
agents, and who have embarked on
sporadic forays of aimless violence
against the “white enemy” (without
regard to any specific offense alleged-
ly commited by the victim). One al-
so hears echoes of the same credo
in conversations and correspondence
with some intellectuals, Negro and
white, who have joined in the revolt
against non-violence.
SS
——
—a
A column that I wrote describing
Malcolm's meeting, with particular
reference to his scornful remarks
about the Reverend Mr. Klunder,
elicited a long, well-phrased letter
from a Negro woman in which she
said, in part:
“I know ... I'm expected to...
flatly denounce Malcolm X's callous
reaction to the young minister's death.
And I'm almost crying inside because
I can’t. My first thought was ‘How
tragic,” but before that thought was
cold I was thinking ‘But they started
it.’ Years ago after an explosion in
the Gary steel mills one of my girl
friends told me how her shock upon
hearing of the accident changed to
relieved laughter because only white
men were killed. I was shocked at the
coldness of it. But when that plane
from Atlanta crashed in Paris it was
sensitive little me who said, aloud,
‘Good! Ic serves shem right! Isn't it
still a matter of allowing color to gov-
erm your feelings for people—a men-
ta] process we learn mainly through
dealing with you? -
“You aré a compassionate man.
This leaves you unequipped to sec
people as they are. I assure you that
‘most other people, including many
of mine, are not like you. You think
that beneath the acquired hatred
THE PROGRESSIVE
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation which
party does
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic