◆ SpookStack

+e erent . hoe ' 4 ( E. Xt shouid be ascertained to what extent Elsheff, Faloetti or other Mine "B" officials, were aware of this ectivity. Fy OA complete history of Eishoff's relations with /_ a a aw = es bor unions from Bis DOGiDLIng GS & GOEL upure- be tn until May, 1957, should be ascertained. pT AL ee Se & it is BugESs a ry) » 19357, igi ntract had expired, Tmited | spies actually brought the eaployees of Mine *3B* to the verge of a strike by falsely telling then that the extension of contract signed by the Progressives 41d not contain a clause that the wage scale would be retroactive. ‘The strikes ' were only averted when the Progressive officials brought the truth home to their members. Inquiry should be directed to ascertain the full eircus~ stances surrounding this end other siaflar iaci- dants. II. Investigation of All Alleged Unfair Labor Practices by Eishoff. There are set out below various specific allegations of unfair labor practices by Elshoff and other officials of Mine *B" during the period of the conspiracy. Fach of these incidents should be thoroughly investi- geted with special regard to coincidence of these incidents with the actual transfer of cash from UMW officials and Elshoff, with the view of esteblishing a relationahip of eanse andi ef~ fect betwoon thes, A, }Falcetti's refusal to discharge five spies on morning ‘pf May 12, 1937, under closed shop rule. (2) Eishoff's knowledge of this. (2) Did Elshoff instruct Falcetti to take such actiont (3) Supervision by Elshoff over Faicetti in gen- @rElLe (4) Business practioe of Faicetti reporting to Elahoff activities of the mine, B. Conversation between Danie® KoGill and Klaboff rele~- tive to discharge of these (1) Good faith of EXlshoff in stating he did not believe he could discharge them under terms of National Labor Relatiaus Act. aa anne a ee ene TS Dn eee ceemetnaenathanalines dietiatensnieneeameimmeamaaneedaml Smee we oe | r