◆ SpookStack

Nand b1¢ L A 100-1822 ent a. xe wo SSA? U1740 FatGOLI:: further stated that the subject had admitted to Mim that he had made application for membership in the Commmist Partyof Germany, but had given his application card to an unidentified friend, and he never knew what action was taken in connection with _the application, and that ha had never paid dues. WARGOLIS also stated to hat RUTHPISCHSR, the subject's sister, and GENARDIPEISLER, the subject's brother, had bean prominent figures in the Communist Party in Germany. On November 29th, the New Tork Office advised by teletype that EISLER had advised Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York, that he had arrived at the Algonquin Hotel on the monring of November 27th, and would remain there until December 2nd. He informed INS that his trip to New York was in connection with the musical acore that he was writing for “Salfleo"., From New York, he was to go to Philadelphia where he was to have a conference with the C ssio f Immigration, and then he intended to return to Los Angeles. avised on December 5th that RISLEE was to return that evening at 11:15 pn, On Novamber 26, 197, a highly confidential source furnished the following information. A letter dated august 11, 1947 was addressed to the subject from Universal Edition, Vienna 1, Karlsplatz 6, requesting permission for the German language publication of FISLER's “book Corposing for the Film. This letter also requested EISLER's permission to > publish bh his work, "hezen" and "Hollywooder Lieder Buch", as well as his new work, "Kammer mie 75 There was also a letter from LOU SININ, 32 Rue Washington, Paris, dated August ), 1947. This. communication sdvisea EISLER that in view of an except onally tight scheduie with a goal for completion of photography in May 1948, it was impossible for him to wait any longer for EISLER to arrive in France, inasmuch as the script writers felt the need of having the composer on hand immediately. x 7 On August 20th, accordi o this confidential source, EISLER re- ceived a communication from referred to in referrenced report, which communication attempted to explain to subject ail. why EISLEK's deal with the“BUNIN PRODUCTIONS had fallen through. old EISLER that LoU BU ORENCE-BEUNIN onmmed the company and made all final de- cisions. MD =< only consulted on various questions, although serious thought given to his opinions, He told EISLER that many of his own pro- posals had been overruled and had not been followed by the company. went on to point out that his work with the com y was only in the field of Sree o7¢ thet be had never had am’tning to do with the hiring of people or the negotiations concerning their contracts. ye The confidential source pointed out tha to note that there was some fric previously in referenced report Was appareriiy attempting to smooth things over between EISLER It is known that she has contacted the EISLER residence many times during the past four months. aaa wd we fou xy interesting referred to