◆ SpookStack

_ CoN KO OW mw ON, 10 OS JESSE GTRTET. - - y RAN FRANCISCO 94108 | 441p) 495-4495 M0 owornces 7 [PE 2 CUMINGS Exe JORDAN erial of the substantive matter Lasted two weeks, I believe. “''u.S. vi Goldstein (1973) No. 73-496, “Dp G. Arizona, Phoenix. Charge: Harboring a federal fugitive and conspiracy. to harbor. The case, involving two other defendants, was a two or three week trial. “U.S. v. Phillips (1976) No. 75-572 and 75-677 Charge: conspiracy to distribute cocaine, possession of cocaine. “In this matter, the “jury was sworn, the defendant ‘entered a 2 plea a of guilty to one of a four- count indictment, ‘without prior nego- tiation with the government. The government. elected to dismiss the remaining three counts, and the case was dismissed. Crt Te lgteelo s. wee am _ dismissed upon the granting of defense motion to suppress the evidence and. dismiss re: ‘collateral estoppel. Litigation involved a two- day hearing on "defendant ' s motion, which evidence was taken | “from the law enforcement officials involved.” tw. s. v. Williams (1976) No. 76-115, D.C.N.D. charge: possession of explosives and explosive substances. This: case was prepared for ‘trial, “and dienissed upon 1 the government ' immediately prior to ‘trial. [ Contempt Trials - -y.8. v. Alter (1972) 72- 16, D.C. N.D. | harge: contempt. | citation for refusal to give testimony “before a federal grand” jury. See, ‘Appeal of this, matter at 482 F.2d 1016.. “owls. vy. Frakes (1975) No. 75-Mise. 14. charge: oe eee , D.C.N.D.: ULS. Vv. Buck (1976). No. 73- 278, D. 6. Oregon, Portland. Charge: purchase of ammunition ‘under a false name. ; “This case was” a2 patent! red wie = wy wg ate ~ s ‘motion, . _ contespt a