◆ SpookStack

against the defendant, as well as the direct examinations of defense wimesses. - | a : | “people v. “Blair (1971) Circuit Court of Cook County (number unavailable at present)*. Charge: murder. I participated as co~ counsel in this matter, participating, I believe, in the voir dire and certain cross-examinations. ** People v. -*(1971) Circuit Court of ‘Cook County (number - umavailable at present)*. Charge: rape. I was sole counsel for defendant. 60 Oo NO | & WLN HY People Vv. (1970) Joliet, Illinois. Charge: battery on a i" oOo prison guard. I was co- -counsel, conducting the voir dire,’ opening _ b= statement, cross-examination, and direct examination of the defen- ‘ bh NO dant, and defense witnesses. ~~ is) 7 People v. Hinton (1972) Circuit Court: oof Cook County oum- -_ sy ber unavailable)*. Charge: escape ‘from custody. a believe SE eed Oo wn another counsel may have been involved in this matter at some point; however, I do not recall. > — o People v. Knox (1972) Circuit Court of Cook County _Gousber _ ~~ unavailable)*. Charge: armed robbery. *X “Y.S.A. v. Buck (1973) No. 73-0290, u. S$.N.D. ‘Charge: purchas ied oO of ammunition under a false name. This case involved protracted Nw par litigation involving an illegal wiretap by the government. The ND: NO * The partnership in which I used to practice in Illinois has been disbanded, and I have been unable to locate the record of these cases by telephone. However, with some more effort, I believe they can be located, if required. . Unless: otherwise. indicated, I-was sole counsel for the defendant. mw N N & & & & 4 LAW OFFICES YP CUMINGS ano JORDAN