◆ SpookStack

EMILY HARRIS, WILLIAM HARRIS, PLAINTIFFS VERSES CHARLES W. BATES; ET AL DEFENDANTS CV 76 0044 _~—C; ; Filed U.S. District Court Central District of California 4 - 5 IAN pat, 65 a~g. Denied as to defendant Gebhardt. Defendant is without sufficient information on which to base an answer to the allegations contained in plaintiffs' paragraph 65 a-g as they apply to the other named defendants. 66-68. Defendant Gebhardt denies he has engaged in conduct or has promoted, encouraged, ordered, solicited, condoned or ratified conduct by others which has irrepa- rably injured the plaintiffs by depriving them of rights secured to them by the United States Constitution and the © laws of the United States. Defendant Gebhardt denies he intends to engage in such conduct or promote, solicit or conspire to conduct such conduct in the future. «~~ Defendant is without sufficient information on which to base an answer to the allegations in plaintiffs’ paragraphs 66-68 as they apply to other named defendants in this matter. 69. Defendant Gebhardt denies the allegations contained in plaintiffs’ paragraph 39-68 are true. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION. 70-73. Defendant Gebhardt incorporates by reference his responses contained in paragraph eight, 33-34 and 39-68 of this answer. Defendant denies he has conspired, combined, confederated or agreed with any of the other named defendants or their agents, officers or employees for the purpose of conmitting acts or committed, aided and abetted, caused, ordered, authorized, financed, oan solicited, encouraged, approved, consented to, condoned ! or %Stherwise promoted acts any of which deprived the plaintiffs of their rights, privileges _or imaunities secured to: them by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth antf/e~ Fourteenth Amendnentse to tne Urited States -1>?-