Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 29
Page 260
260 / 427
EMILY HARRIS,
WILLIAM HARRIS,
PLAINTIFFS VERSES -
CHARLES W. BATES;
ET AL
DEFENDANTS
CV 76 0034
Filed U.S. District Court.
Central District of California
eee 4
57-58. Defendant Gebhardt adopts by reference his —
response set forth in paragraph eight of this answer.
Defendant admits the Los Angeles Office of the F3I has
prepared an investigative report with respect to certain
of the alleged acts and events which form a basis for
the criminal charges for which plaintiffs are scheduled
to stand trial in Superior Court, County of Los Angeles,
State of California, -Defendant admits a copy of this.
report has been supplied to the District Attorney's Office,
County of.Los Angeles, State of California. Defendant
denies he or any officers, agents or employees of the
Los Angeles Division of the FBI acting at his direction
or under his authority released or disseninatec to
the general public any information from the above mentioned
investigative report or from any other memorandum or
documents prepared by the Los Angeles Division of the
FBI and concerned with the acts and events which will
form the basis for the criminal charges for which plaintiffs
are scheduled to stand trial in Superior Court, County
-of Los Angeles, State of California. Defendant adnits
he is aware of two press releases dealing with factual
circumstances concerning certain of the crimes with which
plaintiffs are now charged. (See defense exhibits A and B).
Defendant Gebhardt denies the release of defense exhibits
A and 3 were improper or prejudicial to plaintiffs in that
it infringed or impaired their rights to a fair and
jmpartial trial. Defendant Gebhardt is without sufficient
information on which to base an answer to the remainder
of the allegations contained in plaintiffs' paragraphs
57-58 as they apply to him. Defendant is without sufficient
information on which to base an answer to the allegations
contained in plaintiffs' paragrapns 57-58 as they apply ;
tof ene other named defendants in this matter. |
: ¢
,
. 38 59. Defendant Gebhardt is without sufficient
information on which to base an answer to the allegations
' contained in pluintistat parageapi 29.
- 10-
me TE eye eee te re rt ee tem te ed
- - i . :
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic