◆ SpookStack

~ not only to render the trial in progress unlair, but also to make < | a fair trial in the future imzossible.* “In re in re _Unit®d.states, 286 F. 24 556, 562 n. 5 (Ist Cir., 1951). ‘The 2 aces Ge Misra vu, iigbehavior. are “ss ] RR a ae Ie A he TE CRC amoly detailed, their illegality is odvious, and th ir tei ep wt kh tf ‘these proceedings is so thorough that remedies less drastic fan dismissal are inadequate. A basis for dismissal has been ‘establish a1 ed and the Court should order accordingly. * o ne Oe eee me = - Oo © 8 ~ [AR SET et kee - conpuct? OF A_TYPE "HICH ~ te “PRE PROSECUTION'S Cass a“ ‘LEAD TO w my ’ A_DISMISSAL. we 141) cao ee 17% conduct @etailed ia th appanged affidavits and declarations, the 18: defendant must ‘not kear the ‘difficult if not impossible burden of q. 29; proving that it has tainted the proceeding or the indictment. The ry 20° government is by far the best situated to Produce the relevant evi- Cir., 1972). ixaised the inference that goveramental misconduct aal proceeding, the Prosecution then bears the. bur- den of showing the absence of taint. Xasticar v.'U.S., 406 U.S. Seas ve US. 441, 460 asm. 0 es « assist them in the’ preparation of a leaa ay recognized dcfense to criminal charges. Pitchess Suserior court, 13.3 cat.* A SERESS BM. Superior court, ¢ Will v. Suverios Court, 112 Cal. Retr. 257 (L974yh a A tery see, ——