◆ SpookStack

Ao ee ee So tae chi to BY %. declarations involves illegal government actions directoaseerarde Antes tape ee ete Pe tie ess Aig he the defendants in the instant case. The warrantless: ‘entries, cone ee Ser eee bribe offers for entrapment, threats, and illegal eaveséropning were all perpetrated in an effort to apprehend the defendents. These acts, committed, without he slightest regard for legality Re, eel Abe Oe ee ah ny me and decency, are also rons de conscience of civilized nen. gE oR ~ 5 oo oO Rm HF wD See Rochin v. California, 34 Be.sMig ass. ~ t Land 0 Mc a ea Misconduct, in the legal sense, Means “reprehensible : a . . conduct" which threatens the right to a fair trial. People v. . ~ Seer a) - fos foe Bre) es eek a te ‘ Ditworth, 78 PR Rptr. 817 A569}. ° In cases involving sar less . ~ ey . “Ns, egregious misconduct, the Supreme Court has insisted upon oromot Load and drastic actiol toksee that the ‘waters of justice are not a “polluted, for *the reservoir ‘cannot be cleansed. without first ~ o 8 om OH bed draining it of all impurity." Hesarosh v. United States, 252 U.S. i, 14. To uphold the indictment in the face of such blatantly iViegal’ conduct on the part of the government would be tantenount oe affixing a judicial stamp of approval upon these actions. See han? upta, at 445. Courts have a primary duty to protest the , a’, the laws. The facts in the instant case show a deliberate and continuous disregard for constitutional limitation on: the exercise .©O£ police power. The District court in v U. S$. ve “Banks,” sunra, at 396, stated in dismissing the case for governmental misconduct < that the government must not ke allowed to seek convictions at the’ expense of justice. Dismissal is "warranted in the event that- the deliberate misconduct of [the Government] we is so outragcous.as_