◆ SpookStack

b2 -1 b6 -l, QO - 9° Oo -1- FE+302 (Rev. 1046-95) ‘FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of sanscripion §©6=60.9/09/2004 a Special. Agent,.Emtexred on Duty. (EOD) _ currently assigned to the Anchorage Division, office telephone number | was advised of the official ~ 2 identity of the interviewing Supervisory- Special ormation[ bic -1,2 that the interview concerned ascertaining any information possessed pertaining to the treatment and conditions of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (GTMO). [ thereafter provided the following information: | Cc] traveled to GTMO in February 2002, to debrief a p6 -1,4 detainee identified nef regarding b7C -3,4 case specific information on the "Portland 7" Counterterrorism b7D -1 = matter. was not a member of any interview team. As a b?F -1 Co-case Agent of the Portland 7 case, went to GTMO for the sole purpose of conducting | one interview relating to that case, ; , The interview was conducted in a make- shift plywood shack used for conducting interviews, located adjacent to the "Deg Cages" in Camp X-Ray. When the detainee was brought in for the interview, Po Jobserved the detainee had-a black eye, facial cuts arcund the nose area, and his fingers on both hands b6 -1 were taped up. The detainee; who spoke English, said words to bic b6 -1 condition and treatment. bic ~1 the effect "they", motioning to the Military Police (MP) guards, . had done this to him. A Colonel in charge of the MPs,. whose name [| could not recall, advised that the detainee's injuries were sustained in a scuffle due to the detainee. hecoming non-compliant and had to be bought into compliance by a Rapid Response Team. The. detainee also had a cast on one of his ankles which was for an injury sustained prior to the detainee's arrival at GTMO. ‘C7 dia not have any substantial dealing with any MPs, other military personnel, Department of Defense (DOD) civilians, or any other contractors at GMTO regarding detainees» [aia not observe any aggressive -1 or improper handling, treatment or techniques used by. anyone on any of the detainees inconsistent _with FBI or Department of Justice (DOJ) policy guidelines. had no understanding of what type of harsh or aggressive interrogation techniques were authorized by DOD. 4 did not ask anyone what the DOD tovestigation on 09/08/2900 _.. a tele honical’ Fite # 297-HO-A1327669-a 5 oly Ke -1 Date dicted 09/09/2004 me b7¢ -1 ____-_ RESPONSES-82 by > SA n This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI, it is the proporty of the FBI and is loaned to your agency,