Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Criminal Profiling — Part 1
Page 14
14 / 25
The Profiling and
Consultation Program
The FBI's profiling program has
grown considerably since the late 1970's
from “informal” analysis and profiling
during criminal psychology classes at
the FBI Academy to the present for-
malized program. Currently, the pro-
gram consists of one program manager
and seven criminal profilers and crime
analysts. These Agents were selected
primarily for their investigative ex-
perience, expertise, and educational
backgrounds. The Behavioral Science
investigative Support Unit has found
that anyone seeking transfer into this
highly specialized program must
possess above all other attributes and
accomplishments a strong investigative
background that includes participating
in, supervising, and managing major
case assignments.
During 1985, the Criminal Profiling
and Consultation Program received
over 600 requests for profiling
assistance. It is anticipated that once
the FBI's Violent Criminal Apprehension
Program (VICAP) is fully operational, the
number of profiling requests will nearly
double annually.
One key link to the success of the
FBI's Criminal Profiling Program is its
criminal profile coordinators who are
located at every one of the FBI's 59 field
offices. These highly trained and
selected Agents are responsible for
screening cases and for providing
preliminary investigative suggestions to
investigators. While the field coor-
dinators do not have the authority to pro-
vide profiles to requesting law entorce-
ment agencies, they are authorized to
prepare preliminary “rough draft” pro-
files which are reviewed by the profiling
staff at the FBI Academy prior to being
disseminated to the requesting agency.
Criminal profiling is available to
local, State, Federal, and foreign law
enforcement agencies or departments.
It should be noted that not every violent
crime matter lends itself to the profiling
process. The criminal profile coor-
dinators in the FBI field offices deter-
mine during review of the case whether
it can be profiled. However, while a case
may not be suitable for profiling, the
coordinator may still submit it to the
Behavioral Science Unit for other types
of services. Criminal profilers at the FBI
Academy may assist the law enforce-
ment community by providing inter-
view/interrogation techniques, in-
vestigative suggestions and techniques,
establish probable cause for search
warrants as a result of National Center
for the Analysis of Violent Crime violent
offender research findings, assist pros-
ecutors relative to prosecutive
strategies, and possibly provide
testimony as a witness for the prosecu-
tion or as an expert witness during the
sentence phase of the trial. All cases
must be submitted to the local FBI field
office for review and administrative
handling by that criminal profile
coordinator.
Lt. Commdr. Vernon J. Geberth of
the New York City Police Department
wrote in his book, Practical Homicide In-
vestigation: Tactics, Procedures and
Forensic Techniques, “This program has
proven to be beneficial to law enforce-
ment and has provided homicide detec-
tives with a viable investigative
tool... .”7
Criminal profiling will never take the
place of a thorough and well-planned in-
vestigation nor will it ever eliminate the
seasoned, highly trained, and skilled
detective. Criminal profiling has,
however, developed itself to a level
where the detective has another in-
vestigative weapon available to him in
solving a violent crime. The offender, on
the other hand, has an added worry that
in time he will be identified, indicted,
successfully prosecuted, and sen-
tenced for his crime.
Footnotes
1M. Willmer, Crime and Information Theory (Edin-
burgh, England: The University of Edinburgh. 1970).
2M. Reiser, “Crime-specitic Psychological Consulta-
tion,” The Police Chief, March 1982, pp. 53-56.
3M. Casey-Owens, “The Anonymous Letter
Writer— A Psychological Profile?” Journal of Forensic
Science, vol. 29, 1984, pp. 816-819.
4M. S. Miron and John £. Douglas, “Threat
Analysis: The Psycholinguistic Profile,” FBI Law
Enforcement Bulletin, vol. 48, No. 9. September 1979,
pp. 5-9
5 RR. Hazeiwood, “The Behavior-ariented Inter-
view of Rape Victims: The Key to Profiling,” FB/ Law
Enforcement Bulletin, vol. 52, No. 9, September 1983,
pp. 8-15.
6 A. O. Rider, “The Firesetter—-A Psychological Pro-
file,” F8l Law Enforcement Bulletin, vol. 49, No. 6, June
1980, pp. 4-11.
7 Vernon J. Gebderth, Practical Homicide investiga-
tion: Tactics, Procedures and Forensic Techniques (New
York: Elsevier, 1983), p. 399
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic