Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cesar Chavez — Part 5
Page 89
89 / 126
AMENDING MIGRATORY LABOR LAWS 367
Senator Munremy. Mr. Chavez, you said the Schenley Industries—
is that the outfit that moved the crew from one operation to another ?
Mr. Caavez. No, I was referring to a previous strike, and that was
the Mount Arbor, a rose-producing company in McFarland. ;
Td like to continue. In my own words Td like to give you a little
background of what’s happening in Delano to show the need—
Senator Witu1aus. By the way, when you say “my own words,”
these are all your own words in this paper?
Mr. Caavez. Right.
Senator Wii1a0s. By summarizing?
Mr. Caavez. By summarizing.
Senator Witttams. We read a speech frequently, and when we get
throu. say “now, that’s a very good speech.” Now, I'd like to say
a few on my own. That’s why we have all these bright staff
writers found here.
But n see that all of this is your work.
Mr. vez. That's correct, yes. What I attempt to do here is to
show that great need of having the farmworkers covered under the
National Labor Relations Act.
But when we entered the strike in December 16 of last year we
thought we were just striking workers of the employers that the
workers wanted to strike against.
Senator Witztims. December of 1965?
Mr. Cuavez. I'm sorry, September 16 of 1965. And we found out
soon that we were actually striking, and for reasons we failed to
wnderstand, we found that the civic council in Delano passed a reso-
Fution attacking the association and claim that this was not a bona
fide strike, and that this was a civil rights movement, and had heen
brought abour by outside agitators.
We also found that at the time we had applied for a grant from the
OEO, and this was done before the strike, and we found that the high
School also took a similar position as regards the strike and also as
regards that grant we had applied for from the OKO,
We found that even the local ministerial administration felt that
somehow the strike shouldn't have been called, and in calling strikes
it was not the right thing todo. But nowhere did we find anvone who
was willing to try and bring the two sides together. Nowhere do ive
find that the growers were willing and wanted to meet with us, and
even before the strike started, to meet with us so that we could berin
conversations hoping that the strike would not need to be cailed in the
first place, and after it had been called, hoping that we could settle
the strike before it went any further and became more bitter, and so
orth.
-And so when we speak of a strike in agriculture in California, we
must of necessity also speak of the infringement of civil rights of the
strikers.
Now, let mig give you a little background information what our
experience has Been in Delano. The strike takes in parts of two
counties: Kern and Tulare Counties. We found that the sheriff's
office in Kern County were brought in in large numbers when the strike
first. started, and objected to many of the things that we were doin
in conducting the strike, but especially and specifically they objected
we ee
Pheer ae oO gg OTE
ve ae ——* - : : >
a
a st oN oe a
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic