◆ SpookStack

CARS 8 %, wen el eo SF ar ee ere eee ee ee Se whe iY + ee ETT Conde A aC at a NR Be ESE foe non Ea OER Sere Ieper pe, : * . i 4 * - ce - a : - tae aa i i we ie) ee ee de Yreeme bee 2 ee oe - 8 . oe Se ate we in en oe mes Se aN ee ET ea im eee ee gn co eh pana Memorandum to Xr, Belmont + swe. we ee He rials ag rnd serine ea, ie Re: Lonald Duart Macleang —~ ‘aya : “=~ - @yy Franctse Delfoncy bungee Se gc AOE was ptcked up for drunken driving, Reportedly, he has no Anertcar aos relatives and only three Amertcans seen to have known hin,’ nanely,> 'é3 Bernard Viller, who Journeyed with him on hts return to England and saw him on hts last day tn London, Christopher Isherwood and W,H, Aud British writers who came to U,8. 1939 and becane feroan SEO - tn 1946, neem nme ee PRM er A ee ee cc ee eee me yee ae -: an moe we et we ae aetna tenes - . ” a aN es Author names followtng relatives of Vaclean as interesting © American angles: (1) Alan Maclean, his brother stationed in New York staff of United Nations; (2) Maclean's sister, Nancy, married to Robert Oetking, American Foreign Service offtcer tn Hay, 1950. In 19. he was stationed in Betrut; now reportedly tn England writing for an_. Amertean wire service; (3) Urs, Maclean's steter, Harriet, married Ja: Sheers, Parts, January, 1951, and vistted Macleans tn May, 1951, shor after resigning as security guard, Mutual Security Agency tn Ports. - Author indicates these angles should have been tnvestigated by Amertos authorittes and states that Amertcan and British press indicate FBI.- made some tngutries. However, questioning of American relatives abro was beyond tts province. Seentngly, State or CIA did not deem it. . necessary unttl after dieappearance of Mrs. Maclean, It was potnted = out that without any reflection on Sheera, he was a natural suspect _ Sor the "third man" who may have picked up information of the British cn ae ern tangy Po ae -- . Investigation and may have alerted the ntsstng diplonate. ..:: - (@ cee ate was primartly @ British case and of necesstty major -~ portion of tnveatigation conducted tn England. Ve possessed no. derogatory information re subjects prior to their disappearance fron _ England May, 1951. We interviewed a number of contacts of subjects tn thts country, none of which furntshed informatton tndtcating ==> subjects may have been engaged tn subversive acttuttiesa. Fe promptly disseminated facta in case to appropriate Government agenctes, Fror what we know now of subjects’ activities prior to their being asstgne to this country, a routtne tnuestigatton would have nade then ineligt |” for Government employnent, according to qur etandards, MMMM and - —- pee when tnterutewed 1951 clatned to know of nozpro-Sovtet == acttiutties b -adutsed Burgess was open communist durt + pom > iy Sou doy sia “6 = La - . . . 7 . . a we ee. ee a a wore oat . ee ee a + eee ay ~ lee ve TE alee ae ae Te ee ee Mieke tee ee eee wee oe -_ Meee CB tle af x ete ag ut _ "5