Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 39
Page 10
10 / 124
pene arate toe hy Pace na an i Jl ga i a ee me
Nee plea we
‘
} STANDARD Foun Mo 84
)
"Office Mem andum © UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
ro Wr. A. H. x ae .. DATE: March 29, 1957
emer ee
:
z
- ' FROM ‘Mr. We As Brant Seen = edganae
8 ; wd ET
SUBJECT:DONALD DUART MACLEANS- —, me Siem
i GUY FRANCIS DE uoucy LuRcEss ™ , * A) i
Of ESPIONAGE ~ R —
S ] aA . a oa ob ; Soe
& Edna RO Fluegal has written an article re subjects saeen
s published in "American Hercury” in 3 instal |menta. iret and =
second installments summarized in my memos 1/27/57, ana 16/57. The t
instailment appeared in the April iesue and is briefly summarized here
}Fluegal described as chairman, bolitical Science Department Trinity
College, Washington, D {airs consuitan
to Se Senite inte rDe lis } - *
oy
z - i a
Sanippetnerinbaet ior ion eter tit
os Earae eae
First installment of article highly critical of British for
Sailure to release full facts concerning case. Author commented that
facts mag not Aape heen disclosed because os pnosarble fnpoluement of
Wf Wee vY
British "holy cows" plus fear that Congress’ might enact measures reatr
pooling of classified information by U.S. and England. Article also
critical of British for not notifying U.S. authorities concerning thei
investigation of leaks discovered in 1949. In addition to criticism o
&ritisn, author stated the American angie of the case was totaily
unexplored and raised a number of questions concerning American side o
case, such as: With what Americans did they deal; why the blackout a
who maneuvered it; Who tipped off the subjects; What assurance do we h
that opportunit tes for espionage that subjects enjoyed have been closg
ELTA PPAR eS CET erm
The second installment stated that a routine investigation b
|eceses should have barred : subjects from Government employment invol
access to classified material and that the Foreign Office should have
terminated their aervices at several points tn their career. Without
a ee ee Sree eS Se ee SSeS Pw Sree UG ES Ge
knowing their communist background, both would have been regarded as
security risks under U.S, standards. burgess was reported as having 1
with Fhilby and had contact with CIA, National Security Agency and Sta
Department. Haclean's relatives who had been in U.S. and had had
[eer ise with Americans were named. It was indicated they should h
been investigated. It related that FEI made some inouiries in this
country but Investigation ae y ihe ms was - hia its province
Ate third installment and last installment recit ions
\|vicdimir“Fetrov's (Soviet defector in Australia, 1954] statement. alleg
that subjects were long-term Soviet agents and had fled to, Noecow. Th
| british White Paper published as result of Petrov'#"dtaclosure;-The pr
statement ‘issued by subjects when they first appeared in hos qaw.fe brua
Be anantion written far Brit leh \wanera
a i AN7U ani €ACET pe J FU Ur ticles oust Wiebe ey wreewe wwe
— Atta ge meinsnanennecetss Vt JOF
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic