Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bugsy Siegel — Part 18
Page 37
37 / 100
yet.
fo
ike
SAC August 20, 1946
matter. We told him that we were interested only in the facts in controversy,
and he stated that he did not know completely what those facts were, that it
e necessary to review the transcript of the hearing before Comnissioner .
at the case apparently would turn on rather technical points, and that pp?
it would probably be necessary for his organization to secure technical help
in working out their investigation. He said that at this point he was not
certain that further investigation would be made or that the CPA would do any~
more about this case, but that he would be able to advise us concerning this
on August 20. ;
Upon our return to the cisco Office, Special soon
telephonically commnicated wi a asked him for the name of - rm.
which was pr ing the transcript o e hearing before Commissione
At this tim dvised that he did not think he should furnish ua
the name of the reporter and did not think that he should furnish us with the
transcript inasmuch as their investigation was d
whether or not he had gone into the matter with or
the CPA who had handled the hearing, and he stated that he efly done so
bat that they had not completed the discussion and would not do so in time for
us to mest with him at 4 pem» August 19, it having been explained to him that
Agent OSTHOLTHOFF desired to catch a 5 o'clock plane rather than wait over until
the following day.
Qu August 20, AB ne tho writer had
anothe at which there was also
presen or the CPA wno handled the hearing on poe
th
behalf o CPA before Commissioner This conference was held in the
poe
or the fact that he had no control over ng ta
does, thus indicating that he desired that we be furnished all possible
information concerning this matter.
At this time we again asked o go over the file
on the entire Flamingo Hotel matter, and tated that he would not
do this because of the fact that the investigation on the part of the CPA was pw
still pending; that if we felt his attitude was unreasonable we would have to ”
have his superiors in Washington order him to turn over the file to us, We
also formally asked him for the name of the court xy who was preparing
the tr t of the hesring before Commissions | this was refused
Use said that he did not want to furnish this transcript to
us because there were several things said at the hearing which were off the
record and he wanted to go over those for the comissioner before making any
transcript available to us.
I cola: we could not understand their attitude,
that we were not b?
outsiders” nor were we aligned with the respondents in this SOC }
oe aati tates ete Re a em ee
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic