◆ SpookStack

PAGE FIVE aT (7A-1835. ) YNCLAS E F T O T 9) PARAGRAPH 41 ALLEGES THaT THE JUNE 3, 1981, INTERVIEW OF wILL IAMS waS & RESULT OF A NEED TO PLACE SURVEILLANCE DEVICES IN HIS HOUSE AND CAR HAVING “FAILED IN AN ATTEMPT TO ATTACH AN ELECTRONIC HOMING DEVICE TO HIS CaR.” wHEN IN FACT THE INTERVIEW OCCURRED ONLY AS AN ADJUNCT OF THE EXECUT ION OF SEARCH WARRANTS ON WILLIAMS" HOME, CAR, AND PERSON NECESSITATED BY THE FACT WILLIAMS APPARENTLY “MADE” THE Weiss Tit as © ae . SURVEILLANCE THE EVENING OF JUNE 2, i531. Wes rr 5 HE PREVIOUSLY BEEN ATTACHED PER COURT ORDER MAY 38, 1981, AND THERE WAS NEVER ANY INTENTION OF “BUGGING” WILLIAMS’ HOME. 13) PARAGRAPH 43 ALLEGES WILLIAMS waS IN “CUSTODY” ON JUNE 3, 1931, WHEN IN FACT HE VOLUNTARILY SUBMITTED TO INTERVIEW AND THAT HIS FATHER wAS ALLOWED “ON THE SAME FLOOR WITH HIM" WHEN IN FACT HIS FATHER WAS ALLOWED TO SPEAK HIM TO HIM ONLY DURING THE LAST FEW MINUTES WILLIAMS waS AT THE FBI OFFICE AND ONLY AT THE REQUEST OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONER TE BeAwal An u Co af nf A cure nuWwh AW WOE t COyLD CONVINCE HImM TO ACCEPT PROTECTIVE CUSTODY STaTus. 11) PARAGRAPH 49 ALLEGES THAT THE FIBERS FOUND IN THE SEARCH OF WILLIAMS’ RESIDENCE ARE “SIMILAR™ TO THOSE FOUND r *