◆ SpookStack

“PAGE TWO AT (7a-1835-8. 53) UNCLAS EF T 0 INVOLVED AT THE BRIDGE SURVEILLANCE HAVE BEEN INTERVIEWED BY FBI SPECIAL AGENTS, AND NONE REPORT SUCH A SIGHTING. 2) PARAGRAPH 23 ALLEGES CONFLICTING REPORTS PER- TAINING TO ITEMS OBSERVED IN WILLIAMS VEHICLE ON THE MORNING OF MAY 2%, 1981, HOWEVER, FBI FD-302S OF THE TwO SPECIAL AGENTS AT THE SCENE ARE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME. THE MINOR VARIATIONS ARE THE RESULT OF THE FACT ONE SPECIAL AGENT GA)? AND AN ATLANTA POLICE DEPARTMENT PD) OFFICER ACTUALLY wn 1 Far Cun dee FE — uF C i?) wHTtLe T + ai Wiiane ee] uw Ww +} x 7] a) in RECORDED ITEMS OBSERVED AS A fs rae era) “ At i VIEWED FROM OUTSIDE THE CaR THROUGH THE CAR WINDOWS. 3) PARAGRAPH 24 ALLEGES NO “POLICE REPORT” OF CaRDBOARD BOXES IN WILLIAMS CAR, HOWEVER, BOTH FBI FD-3825 REPORT SAME. 4) PARAGRAPH 25 ALLEGES NO LIST OF CaR CONTENTS MADE, HOWEVER, BOTH SAS aT SCENE RECORDED THEIR OBSERVATIONS AND LISTED VaRIOUS ITEMS OBSERVED ON FD-382S. >) PARAGRAPH 29 ALLEGES THAT THE FBI SA AT THE SCENE OF THE BRIDGE SURVEILLANCE WAS IN CHARGE. ALTHOUGH EACH SA PARTICIPATING IN THE SURVEILLANCES WAS ADVISED THaT HE WAS PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE SURVEILLANCE HE PARTICIPATED 1N, THE CONTROL OF THE SURVEILLANCES REMAINED wITH