Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 29
Page 22
22 / 123
> 5 : ~ . _ ALL ORMATION CONTAINED
ag? % . } HEFE s UNCLASSIFIED
_FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)
-1-
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Date of transcription 02/19/2003
On February 12, 2003, BRUCE E. IVINS, date of birth
04/22/1946, social security account number 280-44-5449, was
interviewed at his place of employment, the United States Army
Medical Research Institute of_Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Fort
Detrick, Maryland, telephone After being advised of
the identity of the agents and the purpose of the interview, IVINS
provided the following information:
IVINS provided the agents with a packet of materials that
he prepared including: a list of individuals that the agents might
want to contact; statements of his work on both the Daschle and New
York Post letters; a spore calculation form for the Leahy letter;
and 'a document labeled as "Hoover Statement" in which IVINS advised
of his work with the letters as well as his independent swabbing
project and safety concerns. These materials are attached herein.
IVINS advised that there was a safety problem with the
handling of the anthrax letters at USAMRIID that put people's
health at risk. Two people at USAMRIID had something to gain by
the letters being analyzed at the lab, and the situation was just a
nightmare for everyone else involved. As such, these two
individuals had the most to lose from any problems uncovered with
handling of the letters. IVINS identified these two individuals as
IVINS heard from
have been saying that IVINS did not handle the letters
which is not true. IVINS gave copies of the report of his work on
the letters tol
The Daschle letter should not have been in Room
IVINS received the letter contained in ziploc bags in
He did not know where the ziplocs came from. He was
not aware of whether they were the original ziplocs which had been
decontaminated, or if the letter was placed inside new ziplocs.
IVINS does not know who processed the letter prior ‘to his receipt
of it or whether the letter was opened inf |
mes
Investigation on 02/12/2003 _at_ Fort Detrick, Maryland
S10 13h
27 9A-BA-C10139 Date dictated N/A
File# 279BR-WE-222936
GET -
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
DATE L2-08-2008 EY 60324 UC BAU/SRS/Le
<1
re
b7E
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic