Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 27
Page 9
9 / 108
To: Washington Field From: Washington ms.
Re: 279A-WF-222936-USAMRIID, 05/24/2005
because there was no indication of a breach in containment from
the hot-side to the cold-side. IVINS indicated that he was
concerned about the pass-thru box because that was where B.a.
entered into B3. In addition, he was concerned about an incident
relayed [jin approximately November 2001. IVINS
informed | Une in November 2001,[-— | saw a USAMRIID
scientist wearing a glove that had been in the hot suite and
j the Daschl sealed in a plastic bag. IVINS told
[hat he and considered the incident to be unsafe
practice, and that rried about contamination issues.
IVINS also informed that in December 2001, due to the
aforementioned glove incident, he swabbed ' desk in the
office shared by IVINS, He read presumptive
positives on a couple o F do any further
testing to definitively determine if the spores were B.a.*
told IVINS that if he never confirmed the spores were
B.a., then the issue was not worth talking about. a
discounted the importance of IVINS' results since Hé did not
consider the issue important enough to confirm the results.™
[_]felt that IVINS' concerns were an overreaction to a
relatively minor incident. specifically told IVINS not
to conduct any sampling without first obtaining approval from
According to advised| on April 15,
2002, that IVINS had approached about conducting _a_samplin
on the B3 pass-thru box on e cold side. a
strongly advised IVINS against conducting any
sampling. did not think that IVINS would conduct
unapproved sampling.*°*
[WRITER'S COMMENTS - Interesting to note that in all of his
interviews and statements regarding the independent survey, IVINS
never mentioned conversing with[ | nor did IVINS relay
strong adui against unauthorized sampling. IVINS
made no mention to £ his concerns regarding the analysis
of the Daschle letter and powder in suite B3, or his perception
of unsafe handling of B.a. evidence by[__] Despite being
advised against such unauthorized action, INS went forward with
his independent sampling mission. ]
IVINS' APRIL 2002 INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYS
e IVINS' motivations for conducting additional
unauthorized environmental surveys
On April 11 or 12, 2002, IVINS became aware of the
ination incident in suite B3. In addition, he learned that
[haa conducted environmental sampling in the suite and
? Ld
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic