Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 10
Page 153
153 / 234
FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)
ALL INFORHATION CONTAINED
HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED
-l- DATE 12-06-2005 BY 60324 uc baw/ra/mis
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Date of transcription 11 / 15 [ 2007
On November 1, 2007, Dx. BRUCE EDWARDS IVINS, date of
birth 04/22/1946, social security account number 280-44-5449,
was approached at the entrance of
office, [ the United Statés Army Medical Researe
Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Fort Detrick,
Maryland, his place of employment, by S ial Agents (SA)
ee ee Dr. IVINS, familiar x
with the interviewing agents, immediately inquired if the
presence of his attorney was necessary. Dr. IVINS was
instructed that all the interviewing agents requested was that
he listen to what the agents had to say. Dr. IVINS and the
interviewing _agents then proceeded to the conference table
located 1 office.
Dr. IVINS was explained in great detail the current
focus of the investigation and the circumstances surrounding the
visit of the agents. Dr. IVINS was informed that the
investigation into his April 2002 FBI repository (FBIR)
submission was completed. The conclusion of the investigation,
despite previous statements regarding his memory and his belief
that others may have prepared the submission, was that it was
he, Dr. IVINS, that prepared the submission and hand delivered
it to the FBIR. After being informed of this information, Dr.
IVINS responded with an "okay" and did not contest the
conclusion that he prepared his April 2002 FBIR submission.
Dr. IVINS was then informed in great detail that now
that the investigators knew who prepared the submission, there
was confusion regarding how the submission was prepared, and why
the submission did not appear to include a sample of RMR-1029.
At one point, Dr. IVINS tried to explain that he was
accustomed to performing single colony picks, and this may be
why his submission did not genetically appear to be RMR-1029.
Dr. IVINS was then told that based on previous
statements to investigators this did not make any sense. The
interviewing agents reminded Dr. IVINS of guidance and
statements he had provided investigators in the past.
° He knew prior to the submission that there were
similarities between RMR-1029 and the mailing material.
Investigation on 11/01/2007 at Frederick, MD . | bo2
Fie # 279A-WF-222936-BEI ~| "77 Date ditaied 11/11/2007
SA
SA
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
WA.
it and its cantents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic