Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
American Friends Service Committee — Part 30
Page 20
20 / 122
%
ee
from L, B. Nichols
Memorandum for
They were also concerned over expressing “a judgment"
oon an individual's integrity and loyalty today on the basis of limited information |
when they could be deceived. I pointed out that common sense and judgment
must be applied and that anyone reading a report would, of course, expect
the person furnishing information to furnish only that within their personal
knowledge and if there were concealed facts which the person interviewed
did not know, then no responsibility would certainly be attributed for those
unknown facts.
I got the very definite impression that Hoskins was taken back
{| somewhat because he admitted that he could fully understand our desire to
interview people directly, In fact, I told them categorically that we could not peri
others to conduct interviews and to secure information for us; that so far as the
Friends Committee was concerned we were certain that they would be motivated
by the highest principles, but that the principle of vigilante action applied and that
_if we were to endorse such a program as they were suggesting then we could not
protest a super vigilante committee who presumed to conduct interviews bearing
on loyalty, They both agreed that there was merit to this.
‘In discussing the matter of the Friends Committee preparing a
written statement, Mr. Cary stated that when a grocer prepares his bill if there
are any mistakes the bill is in favor of the grocer; that if a person prepares a
report it would be in favor of the individual preparing the report, He then
pointed out that he thought it would be much fairer both to the Committee, the
person being investigated and to the Bureau to have a written statement so that the
could be no misinterpretation of what was intended, At this point Hoskins interjec
—and- stated that the way they would prepare the written statements would be to put
them in two parts, The first part would be a factual statement as to the individual
employment. A copy of this would then be furnished to the person being investiga
The second part of the statement would be the confidential judgment of the Americ:
Friends Committee wherein they would comment on the individual's integrity,
loyalty and so forth. This evaluation and judgment on the part of the Committee
would be cansidcred confidential and a copy would not be furnished:to the person w
investigation, but would be furnished only to the Bureau.
ma ey ee cane eee wee ee eT . a oder oe -=3 “Re = ape
: fh ne : . .
any
.-
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic