Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Peace And Disarmament Literature — Part 5
Page 46
46 / 171
on how to de-mobilize, or re-mobilize for peace. Some overall supervisory
agency is indicated, which can pull together information from public and
private sources and coordinate national, state and local efforts.
. The Smal! Business Administration is one resource for smaller firms in
need of financial backing to convert their plants to peacetime pursuits. Other
government measures that might be studied are selective tax benefits during
a specified period of change. Tax credits could be allowed for losses during
a period of reconversion, and tax carry-forward provisions liberalized to
encourage plants to hold onto their workers even if output were small for
atime. Careful study is needed of possible graduated tax reduction as an
aid to private buying and investment.
The California Legislature in April 1958 adopted and sent to Congress
a Joint Resolution requesting a complete study of the economic problems of
disarmament. This, it said, should cover “ways of providing Federal aid
to areas depressed by a reduction in defense expenditures,” and also the
“strengthening of government employment services and compensation sys-
tems, and the possible methods for retraining and relocating workers facing
major readjustments.”
The resolution quoted research findings that a 50 per cent cut in our
defense spending could result in layoffs of 120,000 people in Southern Cali-
fornia alone. It emphasized that all the facts should be brought together as
to the numbers of people employed in various defense industries, where
those industries are, and how they could be helped to change their plants
and resources over to non-defense industry—all of this with the cooperation
of Federal, State and local agencies,
The sample disarmament timetable which we suggested earlier would
take over five years to bring about a reduction of SO per cent below 1958
levels. Meanwhile, some economists point out that present losses in produc-
tivity and employment, simply from letting the economic machinery run
far below capacity, would equal a 100 per cent cut in armaments. They
insist that by bringing production up to its full potential the country could
have bombs AND butter if it wished—‘butter” meaning all the desirable
civilian programs, including foreign aid, which are denied or cut back.
On this point official opinion is not convinced. Congress, while voting
more money for arms than is asked for by the military departments, uses
¢ economy plea to pare civilian programs and appropriations for foreign
economic aid and technical assistance: and our Government states that we
cannot afford to take part in a world plan such as SUNFED (Special United
Nations Fund for Economic Development) until we get disarmament.
The overall problem of financing the transition will not be serious if any
savings from disarmament are immediately used to finance other needed
government programs or tax cuts. The danger of a depression will be mini-
mized if we avoid trying to reduce defense expenditure and the national debt
at the same time. ; .
“Lage
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic