Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
IdiAmin
Page 561
561 / 681
From : TliK PiUVATIS SECRETARY
•
•
•
~ > >s
| p
^ 0
HOME OFFICE
WHITEHALL
SWFA 2AP
20 April 1 977
You asked in your letter of 19 April 1977 for the views of the
Home Secretary, in consultation with the Foreign and Commonwealth
Secretary, en whether an attempt should be made to bring about the
removal to Uganda of President Amin's two young children who came here
for a fortnight's holiday in the care of a doctor and two staff members
on 12 April (the;/ were given two months' leave as is customary for
short visits).
The Home Secretary's view is that no such attempt
should be raade, on the expectation that the party will depart normally
in a few days' time and well before any action of ours could ijring
about their departure.
At least one child of the President has come
and gone uneventfully before.
There would be no basis for President Amin to use the presence
here of his young children as a ground to assist his own entry in June.
A parallel case is that of Colonel Ojukwu, the former Biafran leader,
who has for some years been excluded from this country but whose family
are permitted to enter the UK (his son is at school in Ireland - in
which case the Common Travel Area arrangements apply).
The Amin children could only have been kept out by a personal
direction of the Home Secretary, on the grounds that their presence would
not be conducive to the public good.
Now they are here, they could be
removed compulsorily only if the Home Secretary orders their deportation.
That could only be done in practice on conducive to the public good grounds
that did not deprive the children of their ordinary rights of appeal. It
is the Home Secretary's strong view that there would be no case for
considering deportation on conducive grounds in the interests of national
security etc. so as to deprive the children (like Agee and Hosenball) of
statutory appeal rights. The exercise of any deportation powers could
hardly be justified in the case of two children aged 6 and 3, whoever their
father is.
There is no precedent for deporting in their own right very
young children for any reason at all.
Nor would the Hjme Secretary and the Foreign Secretary recommend at
present an attempt to persuade President Amin to remove the children, for
example by a warning that their security could not be guaranteed while they
were here.
There is no means by which this could be done without the risk
of President Amin giving it wide publicity.
The Home Secretarj' understands
the Foreign Secretary's view is that both deportation and pressure to remove
the children would risk retaliation against the British community in Uganda,
It might well be read by President Amin (as well as the public) as
indicating a decision by HMG to keep him away from the CHGM in June (for
which he would then have several weeks to form his intentions and tactics).
^
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic