◆ SpookStack

Table of Figures Figure 1. Joust Impact Trace Showing a Mode-5 Failure Response ......ssescssersersssessneecsseees 6 Figure 2. Atlas IIAS Risk Contours for Inner-Ear Injury with A = 3.0. Figure 3. Atlas IIAS Risk Contours for Inner-Ear Injury with A = 3.5. Figure 4. Filter Factor Results for Representative Configurations of Atlas Figure 5. Combined Random-Attitude and Slow-Turn Results........ssssssesssesesneessseessseeeses 36 Figure 6. Atlas ITAS Breakup Percentages for Random-Attitude Turns... 37 Figure 7. Atlas IIAS Impacts with No Breakup .. Figure 8. Atlas ITAS Impacts with Breakup... Figure 9. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 1,000. Figure 10. Atlas ITAS Simulation Results with B = 50,000........sssssssessssssssssessneessessesseennees 44 Figure 11. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 100,000........-sssssssssssessssseessersessneesnees 45 Figure 12. Atlas ITAS Simulation Results with B = 500,000... Figure 13. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 5,000,000 Figure 14. Effects of Breakup q-alpha on A for Atlas IAS... Figure 15. Mode-5 Density-Function Values at Three Miles .......scssssesssecssecesseessseerneeernee Figure 16. Atlas IIAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3.00.. Figure 17. Atlas ITAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3,00 Figure 18. Atlas ITAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3.45.. Figure 19. Atlas ITAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3.45 Figure 20. Atlas ITAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A = 6.30.. Figure 21. Atlas ITAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A = 6.30 Figure 22. Impact-Range Distributions Figure 23. Delta~-GEM Breakup Percentages .......ssssscsscssssssessseesssnesesneecssecssnecssscssanecssneeene 61 Figure 24. Delta-GEM Simulation Results with B =1,000.......ssssssssessssesssessesesesesresesseenees 62 Figure 25. Delta-GEM Simulation Results with Best-Fit Shaping Constants . Figure 26. Titan IV Breakup Percentages Figure 27. Titan Simulation Results with B = 1,000.......s:sssssssssssssessesssesssessnssseeseeseeseessees 66 Figure 28. Titan Simulation Results with Best-Fit Shaping Constants........sssssssssessseeens 67 Figure 29. LLV1 Breakup Percentages Figure 30. LLV1 Simulation Results with B = 1,000. 9/10/96 iv RII