Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
65 Hs1 834228961 62 Hq 83894 Sub a
Page 36
36 / 124
ROPERS HEED
SPACE SHIPS,
BY EXMARINE
Hits AF Stand On
Flying Disks
(This is the last of three arti-
cles on the controversial subject
of “flying saucers” and their
investigation by the Air Force.)
BY RICHARD REILLY ©
Ss)
Are the“flying saucers real—
and if they are, { are they?
‘That, in essence, is the ques-
tion that faces the Air Force—
and the American public as, well.
Altho it remains unanswered, it
has stirred no end of opinions and
theories.
One theory advanced from
time to time is that the saucers
are some revolutionary type of
weapon perfected either by this
country or some other nation.
The Air Force, however, dep-
recates this possibility. In a re-
cent statement, it said:
“The Air Force has stated in
the past, and reaffirms at the
present time, that unexplained
aerial phenomena are not a se
ereb weapon, missile or aircraft
developed by the United States,
None of the three military de-
partments nor any other agency |
in the government is conducting}
experiments, classified or other-
wise, with flying objects which
could be a basis for the reported
phenomena.”
Weapon Theory Discounted
In addition, a high-ranking Air
Force officer indicated to the
"Times-Herald that it is -believed
impossible the saucers could be
@ foreign weapon.
Regarding the question as to
whether flying saucers exist, Lt
Robert White, public informa-
tion officer, said the Air Force
believes reliable observers such
as veteran airline pilots are sin-
eete when they report sighting
unidentified objects,
‘Phe Air Force was tossed a hot
potato recently by Maj. Donald
BR. Keyhoe, U.S.M.C. (ret.), who
claimed in his recent book, “Fly-
ing Saucers from Outer Space,”
that the saucers not only are real
but that they are of inter-plane-
tary origin.
Furthermore, Keyhoe contends
that the so-called “Utah film”
pomgecg ty the Air Force proves
4 we
xneory Bolstereet——,
Keyhoe’s inter-planetary theory
was bolstered by a letter pub-
lished on the jacket of his book
from Albert M. Chop, former Air
Force civilian expert on the
saucer project, who now is with
the Douglas Aircraft company in
California, |
In_the letter, Chop stated:
-“The Air Force, and its inves!
gative agency, ‘Project Blueboo!
are aware of Maj. Keyhoe’s con:
clusion that the flying saucers
are from another planet. The!
Air Force has never denied that
this possibility exists. Some of}
the personnel believe that there
may be some strange natural |
phenomena completely unknown
to us, but that if the apparently
controled maneuvers reported
by many competent observers
are correct, then the only re-
maining explanation is the inter-
Planetary answer.”
Upon publication of the letter
Written on Defense department
stationery—the Air Force chal-}
lenged Chop’s claim and said he
was merely expressing his per-
sonal opinion.
Chop subsequently admitted
that he was not speaking for
the Air Force, but maintained
that some of the investigative
personnel had subscribed to the
interplanetary theory. He said
this was based on “personal con-
tacts with these various indi-
viduals” and insisted that it was|
“a true’ statement.”
Charges Cover-Up
Amplifying his theory that the
saucers come from another
planet, Kehoe claims they could
originate from some other body
in the earth’s solar system—
such as Mars or Venus—or from |
some other system or universe.
Kehoe charges that the Air}
Force is convinced that the
saucers are space ships from|
another world, but that it is cov-|
ering up because of a fear that
such a disclosure would result in
widespread panic.
‘The Air Force, however, in-
sists that this is not so—that it
is holding back no important
facts from the public.
i. White said the names of
beresbetivolved in the e-htiass
/ A
NOT RECORDED
afe-witield, and reportsShish’
divulge the capabilities of our
aircraft, radar and electronic
equipment are classified, All
other information with xespect
to sightings is a matter of pub-
lic record, he said.
Keyhoe maintains, tho, that
the Air Force has refused to 1e-
lease many analyses of sighting
reports. He points out that the
{names and locations connected
with the incidents cotild be de-
leted, if necessary. ~
Wants Film Released
Keyhoe also claims that the
Air Force should release the
final intelligence analysis on
the Utah film. ,
In connection with this, Key-
hoe recently sent a,telegram to
high Air Force officials charging
that since the Air Force had im-
plied that he had misrepresented
the analysis of the Utah film,
either he or the Air Force was
lying.
The Times-Herald asked a top
Air Force spokesman if Keyhoe
had, in fact, misrepresentec the
Utah film analysis. He declined
to comment.
In his telegram
book—Keyhoe stated:
“The final analysis proved
that the saucer formation could
not be explained as any known
aircraft or other conventional
objects.”” |
Cites Conclusions
The spokesman was asked if
this statement were true or false,
He said that, to date, the Air
Force has neither affirmed nor
denied it.
‘eyhoe also contends the an}l-
ys concluded the objects were
nqt birds and were nob caustd
by weather conditions.
specifically, Keyhoe claims the
|
as in his
Times Herald
Wash. Post
Wash. News
Wash. Star
N. Y. Times
AY. Y. Compass
Date: Sg
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic