◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

BayOfPigsVolumeIVTheTaylorCommitteeInvestigationOfTheBayOfPigs

312 pages · May 15, 2026 · Broad topic: War & Geopolitics · Topic: Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs · 5 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
One of the few points on which Mr. Bundy was challenged was with reference to his statement that he did not believe that the operation had been run from the White House. One of the members of the committee, otherwise unidentified, stated "the messages make it appear that it was very close to this Icontrol of the operation from the White House]. Was this 6.5/ desirable?" Mr. Bundy did agree that the planning should have been more explicitly laid out and that the responsibilities more clearly defined. In his summary statement he indicated that among the numerous lessons which were learned as a result of this operation were the following: political risks would have been minimized by quick, positive success; the excessive concerns for secrecy, covertness, and plausible deniability were so extreme that they made for inefficiency in the operation; and both Agency and military personnel became advocates of the operation and found themselves unable to render objective judgments--the less so the longer the invasion was postponed. Perhaps the most serious weakness according to Mr. Bundy was the failure of senior personnel to step 66/* forward and speak about their reservations. As to the last item, General Taylor strongly supported Mr. Bundy's position noting, "I don't believe the military view, ~ Bundy's statement on deniability was: "As I reflect on the cove~tness of this operation, I'm amazed that we thought there was a chance of deniability." 67/ This was quite a switch because on 18 April 1961, he was urging-the President to authorize USN air support for the B-26s because "the immediate request I would grant (pecause it cannot easily be proven against us and because the men are in need,l ••• "68/ 75
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 82
Jump straight to page 82 of 312.
Reader
Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the War & Geopolitics archive hub and the more specific Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
pigs operation soviet control induce
Related subtopics
SOVIET PROPAGANDA ACTIVITIES IN CUBA
2 documents · 1184 known pages
Subtopic
1P Ee
1 documents · 3 known pages
Subtopic
Subtopic
Cia'S Anti-Castro Policies
1 documents · 408 known pages
Subtopic