Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
BayOfPigsVolumeIVTheTaylorCommitteeInvestigationOfTheBayOfPigs
Page 173
173 / 312
'1' In light of his comment to Kent, his greater concern about .
1 than
-a~b-=o-::-:uCOt------'t=-"h::-:e=--s=-t:':::-a=-=t=e----::::o-:l:f,----:o:t::-'l:h::-:e=-----:l.=·n=v=a:O:-=s-orl.=o=n-----;<l.=mm=eo-:a:r:l.=·
a=-t~e:;o-orly~=u=p=o=n~his return
from Puerto Rico, and his woeful performance both as a member
and witness before the Taylor Committee suggest the onset
of the mental deterioration reported in Leonard Mosley's
volume on the Dulleses.
158/
Mosley makes reference
to Dulles's plan to respond to the versions of the Bay
of Pigs operation which had appeared, or were about to
appear, in articles and books about the Kennedy Administration
by Theodore Sorensen and Arthur M. Schlesinger.
According
to Mosley, Eleanor Dulles, Allen's sister, and Dulles's
daughter, Joan, persuaded Mr. Dulles to withhold the article
because
"Allen had already IJune 1965] begun to lose
command over his memory and ideas.
If it were ever
to be printed, it would not be a credit to him, be-
cause it was from a man who had lost about thirty
percent of his faculties."
The Allen Dulles Papers held by the Princeton University
contain copies of three draft manuscripts of the proposed
article written in 1965 and entitled "My Answer on the Bay
of Pigs."
The copies bear the following caveat:
NOTE REGARDING THIS FILE AND TO BE KEPT WITH IT
(~e article by Allen Welsh Dulles on the Bay of
Pigs, ana background material):
Mrs. Allen W. Dulles wishes to state that
her husba.nd decided not to publish this article,
because there was so much more in his favor he
could have said, if he had been at liberty to do
so, that the material was inadequate.
Signed for Mrs. Dulles
F. Garner Ranney
Archivist to Mr. Dulles
Review of the manuscripts confirms the wisdom of withholding
~ublication.
There is no question, however, that many of
Mr. Dulles's criticism of both Sorensen and Schlesinger were
well taken and much deserved, if for no other reason than as
pointed out by Mr. Dulles, neither man was involved in the
operational planning or was in on many of the confidential
sessions with the President and others to which Dulles was a
party.
Sorensen, by his own admission, played no part in the
Bay of Pigs activity, but this did not deter him from
becoming an "authority."
Schlesinger, however, came to be
regarded as "the authority" on the Bay of Pigs with the
publication of A Thousand Days.
He sUbsequently would criticize
both Dulles and Bissell for their failure to say anything to
the Taylor Committee about the assassination plots against
Castro. 159/
As noted in Volume 3 of this history, however,
the
assa~nation activity was separate and apart frqm,the
Bay of Pl.gs action1 and Jake Esterline, Chief, WH/4, heicl.
167
':.'
no knowledge of the plot.
.
.•~.J.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
pigs operation
soviet control induce
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic